Williams et al. (1981): Did television exposure change children's behaviour?
Homework type: Analysis
Added: yesterday at 15:12
Summary:
Explore how Williams et al (1981) revealed the impact of television exposure on children’s behaviour, aggression, creativity, and development in the UK.
Williams et al (1981): Does Television Influence Children’s Behaviour?
As television became an ever-more ubiquitous feature of British households in the latter half of the twentieth century, concerns about its impact on children’s development and behaviour began to resonate among parents, educators, and policymakers. The 1970s and 1980s saw a significant rise in the variety and availability of television programming in the UK, ushering in both excitement and disquiet over how such a powerful medium might affect the nation’s youth. Amidst increasing discussions in education and psychology about media influence—reflective of anxieties found in Parliamentary debates and campaigns by groups such as the Campaign for Press and Broadcasting Freedom—a fundamental question emerged: does television exposure, especially where it is newly introduced, alter children’s behaviour in tangible ways?
Williams et al’s 1981 natural experiment stands as an essential study in this regard. Designed to move beyond the limitations of laboratory settings, their investigation seized upon an opportunity rarely afforded to researchers: a community untouched by television (“Notel”) was about to receive it for the first time. Thus, the study promised to uncover the real-world behavioural ramifications of television in situ. The research analysed shifts in aggression, creativity, intelligence, and leisure activities amongst children before and after this major cultural change, comparing Notel with similar towns that already had access to television.
This essay explores the methodology, findings, and implications of Williams et al’s investigation, offering both a critical evaluation and reflection on its relevance within the context of British education and society.
---
Societal and Research Context
By the early 1980s, the British media landscape had transformed, with the arrival of colour television and channels like BBC Two, ITV, and (shortly after the study) Channel 4, enabling children to access a panoply of content previously unimaginable. This expansion, while hailed for its democratic reach, fuelled debate about the developmental cost to younger viewers. Concerns about media violence were common enough that teachers and headteachers in the UK often cited disruptive or aggressive behaviour with reference, informally, to playground reinactments of television scenes—from Doctor Who’s monsters to the fisticuffs of police dramas.Previous research, much of it laboratory-based or correlational, suggested possible links between televised violence and real-world aggression, but such work struggled to decouple media influence from background variables such as family environment or prior behavioural dispositions. Williams et al’s study found its rationale in the unique opportunity presented by Notel: a town about to be exposed to the full range of television’s influences, hitherto absent. This “natural experiment,” involving comparison towns (Unitel and Multitel) already familiar with television, offered an ideal crucible to observe behavioural shifts that might be attributed to television itself, rather than extraneous factors.
---
Methodology: A Naturally Occurring Experiment
Williams et al’s approach is rightly celebrated for its ecological validity. Rather than inviting children into a lab or exposing them to set programming, the researchers tracked natural patterns as television arrived in Notel. The study's quasi-experimental design involved three demographically similar Canadian towns given pseudonyms: Notel (no TV until the study began), Unitel (one TV channel), and Multitel (multiple channels). The schools in these communities included children from a mix of socioeconomic backgrounds, akin to rural and small-town British settings, thus allowing insights transferrable to discussions about UK media exposure in non-metropolitan areas.The sample focused mainly on children of primary school age, as they were seen as most impressionable and their playground behaviour most susceptible to external influences. Key variables assessed included:
- Aggression: Both physical (hitting, shoving) and verbal (insulting, taunting), measured in school environments where children were observed by independent researchers. - Leisure Activities: Participation in outdoor play, interaction with peers, involvement in community events, and time spent reading, tracked through questionnaires and discussions. - Cognitive Measures: Standardised intelligence tests (such as those similar to British IQ and reading tests) and creative thinking tasks designed to assess originality and problem-solving.
To reduce the observer effect (whereby children might alter their behaviour because they know they are watched), Williams’ team ensured a “settling-in” period: observers spent time at the schools before officially recording data, so that their presence would become mundane. Behavioural incidents were counted using objective criteria (e.g., a shove counted as physical aggression; a mocking retort as verbal), ensuring reliability. The use of control towns with differing levels of television access buttressed the experiment by providing comparative data to distinguish television’s impact from broader societal changes.
---
Key Findings: Television’s Immediate Impact
The results, while nuanced, were striking in several respects.Aggression
After television was introduced in Notel, observers noted a sharp rise in both physical and verbal aggression among children, particularly in the playground during break and lunchtimes. For instance, incidents of pushing, shouting, and exclusionary behaviour increased markedly compared with previous observations, and these trends were not mirrored in Unitel or Multitel, where TV was already embedded. Williams et al hypothesised that the sudden exposure to aggressive models on television—whether in cartoons or dramas—may have provided new scripts for children's social interactions, supporting theories such as Bandura’s social learning model, which contends that children imitate behaviours seen in rewarded or successful characters.Cognitive and Creative Abilities
Intriguingly, the data on IQ and creativity yielded more ambiguous conclusions. The expected decline in cognitive test scores did not materialise to a statistically significant extent. However, teachers and parents reported subtle shifts: children spent less time reading for pleasure or engaging in creative play, often choosing instead to recount television narratives or mimic popular characters. The number of books borrowed from local libraries decreased in Notel after TV arrived, echoing concerns heard in British educational circles of the time—namely, that television would supplant reading and constructive imagination.Leisure and Social Engagement
Further, children in Notel devoted more time to solitary or family-based TV watching in the evenings, and less time outdoors or participating in clubs. The decline in community participation (such as Scouts or Brownies) was small but measurable. While some leisure activities persisted, passive consumption of screen-based media began to compete with, and at times displace, more active forms of recreation.---
Strengths, Limitations, and Ethical Considerations
Strengths
The study's naturalistic approach set it apart: rather than manufacturing artificial scenarios, Williams et al observed genuine behavioural trends as children experienced television for the first time. Additionally, the use of comparison groups and systematic observation provided a solid foundation for identifying cause-and-effect relationships.Limitations
Nonetheless, no study of this kind is without flaws. The definition and measurement of “aggression” rested heavily on observers’ interpretations, and even objective criteria can be subject to bias. Two years is a relatively short time to assess enduring effects, particularly considering that habituation to a new medium might take several years. Furthermore, it proved difficult to rule out all other factors; wider societal or cultural shifts, unrelated to television, could have influenced behaviour. The study also focused largely on the short-term and mainly during the initial communicative shock of television’s arrival; it remains unclear if some adverse effects might dissipate or new ones appear in the longer term.Ethical Considerations
By modern standards, the introduction of television to a community without proper preparation or support might raise safeguarding queries, especially if negative outcomes were anticipated. That said, the observational techniques used did adhere to norms for protecting children’s anonymity, and parental consent procedures were followed.---
Implications for Education and Policy
Williams et al's research rapidly gained traction in UK educational psychology debates, validating many teachers’ anecdotal suspicions about the disruptive potential of certain television programmes. The findings contributed support for the social learning theory: children are likely to imitate behaviours they see rewarded on screen. Thus, educators and parents were urged to monitor not only the quantity but the quality of programmes consumed. Initiatives from the 1980s onwards, such as “TV clubs” and guided viewing, reflected a move towards deliberate, critical engagement with media.At the policy level, the study’s findings underscored the need for guidance on screen time—echoed in reports by the British Medical Association and government White Papers on children’s health and wellbeing. More recently, these conversations have extended into the digital age, with schools across the UK now teaching digital literacy and responsible media use as part of the PSHE curriculum.
Future researchers have responded to Williams et al’s pioneering work by embarking on longer-term studies and, crucially, by differentiating between genres within children’s viewing habits. Later investigations have found, for instance, that educational programming can foster prosocial behaviour and cognitive skills, an area underexplored in the original study.
---
Conclusion
In summary, Williams et al (1981) furnished compelling evidence that television can indeed affect children’s behaviour, notably with respect to aggression and shifts in leisure pursuits. Through their natural experiment—a rare occurrence that would be hard to replicate—they demonstrated a causal link between initial exposure to television and increased aggressive behaviour, while offering a more complex picture regarding cognitive outcomes.The study stands as both a product of its time and an enduring warning for contemporary media engagement. While much has changed in the technological landscape, lessons from Williams et al’s work continue to resonate: media consumption requires active management, critical scrutiny, and, above all, partnership between families, schools, and the wider community to ensure positive outcomes for children.
In today’s world, where screens are more portable and content more varied than Williams’ team could possibly have imagined, this research urges us to remain vigilant and proactive in safeguarding children’s development amid the alluring glow of the television—and its many modern successors.
Rate:
Log in to rate the work.
Log in