Exploring Key Themes in R.C. Sherriff’s Journey’s End

This work has been verified by our teacher: 15.01.2026 at 19:59

Homework type: Essay

Added: 15.01.2026 at 19:39

The Enduring Themes of *Journey’s End* by R.C. Sherriff

---

Comradeship and the Necessity of Solidarity

This bond can be seen in the gentle friendship between Osborne and Raleigh. When the fresh-faced Raleigh first joins the company, it is Osborne who guides him through the disorientating routines and grim realities of life at the front. Osborne, who is affectionately referred to as ‘Uncle’ by the other men, listens to Raleigh’s excitement and fear with understanding, softening the brutal entrance into trench life. Their shared conversation about rugby and poetry offers a brief respite, hinting at a society outside the mud and wire where young men’s futures stretched ahead, not cut short by artillery.

Stanhope’s relationship with his men further typifies the theme of comradeship. When Hibbert attempts to abandon his post, claiming neuralgia, Stanhope does not simply confront him as a derelict soldier—he admits his own terrors, forging a moment of mutual recognition and solidarity. Thus, leadership in the trenches requires not only authority, but vulnerability.

The group’s shared humour, often found in conversations with Mason, the company cook, provides vital moments of release. Jokes about onion tea and tinned pineapple are meagre comfort, but laughter becomes an act of defiance—a reminder of humanity within inhuman circumstances. The camaraderie formed during these moments stands in marked contrast to the emotionally distant superior officers, such as the Colonel, who appear oblivious to the suffering beneath the surface, reinforcing the distinct world inhabited by the men at the front.

The psychological importance of these friendships is most tragically revealed by Osborne’s death. His loss is felt as a keystone removed from the dugout’s fragile edifice, underscoring how deeply entwined the men’s fates have become. Such emotional blows only intensify the soldiers’ reliance on one another, sharpening the play’s depiction of comradeship as both a strength and a vulnerability.

---

The Unvarnished Reality of War and Its Psychological Toll

Sherriff’s acute attention to the detail of life in the trenches—the filth, cold, pervasive rats, and perpetual tiredness—creates a world where men “never get undressed in the line” and sleep is a memory. These conditions serve not only as a backdrop but as protagonists in their own right, sapping morale and distorting the men’s sense of time and hope.

Psychological strain becomes most evident in Stanhope and Hibbert. Stanhope, an officer revered by his men, finds himself dependent on whisky to numb his dread and guilt. His drinking is not glamourised but presented as a necessary evil, one that distances him from his ideals and from those closest to him. Hibbert, conversely, attempts to escape by feigning illness, the pain in his nerves a physical manifestation of the mind’s refusal to withstand further trauma. Stanhope’s harsh, almost violent response to Hibbert initially seems heartless, yet it is underpinned by sympathy—for both are equally trapped. Their exchange brings into relief the stigma surrounding psychological collapse in wartime, and the play’s refusal to condemn those whose strength fails them.

Rather than portraying war through patriotic rhetoric or scenes of valour, Sherriff’s central focus is on the interior battles—fear, guilt, and the daily negotiation between despair and duty. In this respect, *Journey’s End* stands alongside other British works from the canon of war literature, such as Wilfred Owen’s poetry, in its stark rejection of romanticised narratives.

---

Varieties of Leadership and the Burden of Command

Osborne presents a gently contrasting model of leadership. Older and more measured, he is a father figure—empathetic, self-effacing, and the quiet heart of the company. His ability to listen, advise, and soothe is as vital as Stanhope’s skill in command. Osborne’s refusal of evacuation, and his willingness to undertake dangerous assignments without complaint, demonstrates a form of moral steadiness that profoundly affects those around him.

Their leadership styles—Stanhope’s intensity and Osborne’s calm—offer a nuanced perspective on the roles assumed during wartime. Both are necessary, yet both are tinged with individual loneliness. The burden of care, to be responsible for the lives of others, is shown as an isolating experience, one that tests the very limits of character.

---

Coping Mechanisms and the Pursuit of Escape

Daydreaming and reminiscence provide another means of escape. Osborne’s description of his English garden, or Stanhope’s longing for the “good old bath” at home, offer glimpses into other, saner worlds—perhaps unattainable, but necessary for the maintenance of hope. The longing for these small pleasures underlines the humanity of the characters, existing in radical contrast to the mechanical violence of the war.

Alcohol, notably for Stanhope, straddles the line between aid and danger. His drinking numbs pain but threatens to erode his authority and self-respect. This ambiguity reflects the improvisational nature of coping in extremity—no single method is wholly sufficient, and each comes at a cost.

Routine itself is a strategy for survival. The precision with which the men arrange their dugout, attend to duties, and even hang their limbs out of beds to avoid rats—all create a sense of control in an uncontrollable landscape. Each strategy, from gallows humour to private fantasy, reveals the constant effort to retain sanity.

---

The Destruction of Innocence and Youth

Raleigh’s journey is emblematic: idealism, quickly battered by suffering. The war’s relentless attrition is not only physical but spiritual, stripping away the certainties of youth. Raleigh’s reactions to Osborne’s death and Stanhope’s struggles reflect the erosion of the old structures—school, family, even hero-worship—under the weight of ceaseless violence.

The arc of Raleigh’s character, from optimism to devastating loss, encapsulates the wider tragedy of a generation. The play becomes not just a tribute to those who fell, but a memorial to what was lost within them before they died.

---

Conclusion