Understanding Jesus' Identity in Mark's Gospel - Edexcel GCSE RE
This work has been verified by our teacher: 16.01.2026 at 17:37
Homework type: Essay
Added: 16.01.2026 at 17:11
Summary:
Mark portrays Jesus as divinely endorsed yet suffering Messiah: powerful in miracles, redefines messiahship, misunderstood disciples, call to sacrificial faith.
How Does Mark’s Gospel Present the Identity of Jesus?
Mark’s Gospel provides a vivid and sometimes unsettling portrait of Jesus, one that intertwines miraculous authority with the pathos of suffering and apparent rejection. Across its brisk narrative, Mark employs dramatic episodes, theological titles, and literary motifs to shape a multifaceted identity for Jesus, inviting readers to reconsider common assumptions about what it means to be the Messiah. Rather than presenting Jesus solely as a triumphant figure, Mark’s account points to both divine endorsement and the necessity of suffering, challenging the expectations held both in his own time and by subsequent generations. In this essay, I will explore how Mark develops these themes through key moments such as the baptism, Peter’s confession at Caesarea Philippi, the Transfiguration, the miracle stories, and the repeated passion predictions. Along the way, I will examine the historical and cultural setting, discuss the significance of different titles ascribed to Jesus, and evaluate how Mark’s presentation continues to shape Christian thought and practice.Background and Context
Tradition attributes the Gospel of Mark to John Mark, an associate of Peter, although the actual authorship remains subject to scholarly debate. Scholars generally date the work to around AD 65–75, a period of tension and persecution, possibly during or following the traumatic destruction of the Jerusalem Temple. Mark’s intended audience appears to have been Gentile Christians living in Rome or Syria—people contending with suffering, incomprehension, and external hostility. The literary style of Mark is immediate and lively, often using the present tense and vivid descriptions, as in “immediately” or “at once”. A recurring feature is the so-called “Messianic Secret”, where Jesus instructs people not to publicise his identity, as well as the repeated use of titles such as “Son of Man” and “Son of God”. In contrast to widespread Jewish hopes for a victorious Messiah who would rescue Israel from Roman rule, Mark’s Gospel reorients attention towards service, suffering, and ultimate vindication through God’s power. These contextual concerns fundamentally influence the way the text shapes its portrait of Jesus.The Baptism of Jesus (Mark 1:9–11): Divine Endorsement and Mission
Right at the outset, Mark positions Jesus’ baptism as a pivotal public act that sets the tone for his entire ministry. In Mark 1:9–11, Jesus undergoes baptism by John in the Jordan. As he emerges from the water, the heavens are “torn open”, the Spirit descends “like a dove”, and a voice from heaven proclaims, “You are my beloved Son; with you I am well pleased.” This brief but profound scene immediately claims a unique status for Jesus, indicating a special relationship with God and signalling divine approval.The manifestation of the Spirit and the heavenly voice can be seen as early evidence for the Trinitarian understanding later developed in Christianity. The scene also draws on Hebrew Scripture: descending Spirit calls to mind the spirit anointings of Old Testament prophets and kings, underscoring Jesus’ role as both messianic and prophetic. Some scholars, however, argue that this moment is less about ontology (who Jesus is in essence) and more about commissioning—Jesus is set apart publicly to fulfil God’s work, following in the line of Israel’s faithful. In this reading, Jesus’ endorsement is one of function rather than nature.
For Mark’s original audience, experiencing threats to faith, this immediate affirmation of Jesus’ unique status would provide reassurance. Conversely, those seeking unequivocal historical proof of Jesus’ uniqueness might find the episode limited; it is, after all, a highly symbolic, narrative-driven moment. Nevertheless, Mark’s account insists from the beginning that Jesus operates on a level of authority derived directly from God.
Caesarea Philippi and Peter’s Confession (Mark 8:27–30): Messiah and Misunderstanding
A turning point comes halfway through the Gospel narrative when Jesus questions his disciples about his identity (Mark 8:27–30). Peter responds by declaring, “You are the Messiah.” This admission marks both insight and confusion. In first-century Jewish expectation, the Messiah was envisioned as God’s anointed king, a deliverer who would restore Israel’s national fortunes. Peter’s confession seems at first to fulfil those expectations.However, immediately following this declaration, Jesus strictly instructs the disciples to tell no one, and goes on to predict his rejection, suffering, and death (Mark 8:31). Here the Markan secret is starkly evident: Jesus does not wish the “Messiah” title to be spread, perhaps to prevent misunderstandings about the nature of his mission. Mark’s account subverts the popular image of a conquering hero, redefining messiahship in terms of service and necessary suffering.
Jesus’ silence-demand could signal a narrative strategy—Mark wants readers to move beyond mere labels and press into the deeper reality revealed through Jesus’ destiny. For ancient and modern readers alike, this moment asks us to set aside easy assumptions about religious or political power and look towards a different kind of leadership, one grounded in self-sacrifice.
The Transfiguration (Mark 9:2–8): Glimpse of Glory and Prophetic Continuity
Shortly after Peter’s confession, the narrative offers a remarkable episode: the Transfiguration (Mark 9:2–8). Jesus is revealed in dazzling brightness on a mountain, accompanied by Moses and Elijah, leading figures in Israel’s story representing Law and Prophets. The scene is enveloped in a cloud, and again, a voice affirms, “This is my beloved Son; listen to him.”The Transfiguration weaves together several threads. It draws a continuity between Jesus and Israel’s sacred past, positioning him within the context of Jewish tradition while affirming his superiority. The radiance and heavenly voice evoke scenes of theophany—direct manifestations of God’s presence, as experienced by Moses on Sinai or Elijah on Horeb. Only three disciples are present (Peter, James, and John), suggesting a select group is allowed a privileged glimpse that will be all the more meaningful in hindsight, after Jesus’ passion.
Some interpreters see this as a visionary experience rather than a literal metamorphosis, stressing the theological symbolism over historical details. Others construe it as preparation for the coming ordeal at Jerusalem, reinforcing Jesus’ divine identity whilst anticipating his impending suffering. However viewed, the episode balances the starkness of the humiliation narrative with moments of unmistakeable glory.
Miracles and Nature Control: Authority and Compassion
Across the Gospel, Mark details numerous acts of healing, restoration, and nature-control through which Jesus demonstrates unparalleled authority. Notably, in Mark 4:35–41, Jesus calms a raging storm with a command, leaving his disciples stunned: “Who is this? Even the wind and waves obey him!” This story, along with exorcisms and healings (such as the raising of Jairus’ daughter in Mark 5), establishes Jesus as one with power extending beyond the ordinary realm.Miracles in Mark function on more than one level: they are signs authenticating Jesus’ mission, gestures of compassion for the suffering, and, in some readings, symbolic actions pointing to God’s sovereignty over chaos (represented by the turbulent sea, for example). For believers, these wonders confirm Jesus’ divine status. Yet many critics, especially from the Enlightenment to today, argue that such episodes are theological narratives—intended to illustrate deeper truths rather than report literal events.
Nonetheless, the impact on Mark’s first audience would have been profound, presenting Jesus as uniquely able to bring order, healing, and hope, thereby inviting trust even amidst adversity.
Titles in Mark: “Son of God”, “Son of Man”, and “Christ”
Throughout Mark, a careful tapestry of titles is woven together. Most notably, “Son of God” (used by the heavenly voice at baptism and by the centurion at the crucifixion, Mark 15:39), “Son of Man” (Jesus’ preferred self-designation), and “Christ” or “Messiah” (Peter’s confession, Mark 8:29).The title “Son of God” signals a special intimacy with the divine but would have carried different overtones for Jewish and Gentile readers alike—ranging from Davidic kingship to outright claims of divinity. The title “Son of Man,” drawn from Daniel 7, suggests an apocalyptic figure invested with authority but also grounds Jesus’ mission in vulnerability and suffering. Meanwhile, “Messiah” links to Jewish hopes for an anointed deliverer, yet in Mark’s hands, its meaning is controversial, redefined through Jesus’ death and resurrection.
Mark’s nuanced use of these titles resists easy labelling: is Jesus a human teacher, an otherworldly judge, or suffering servant? This ambiguity appears intentional, compelling readers to move beyond simplistic answers and grapple with the paradoxes at the centre of Christian faith.
Passion Predictions and the Suffering Messiah (Mark 8:31; 9:31; 10:33–34)
Three times, Jesus predicts his impending betrayal, death, and resurrection (e.g. Mark 8:31: “the Son of Man must suffer many things…”). Each time, the disciples fail to grasp the meaning, preferring to focus on their own expectations of glory. Mark thus places suffering and rejection at the very core of Jesus’ identity, insisting that true messiahship is marked not by conquest but by willing endurance of suffering for others.For Christians facing persecution, this recasting of messianic hope was nothing short of radical. Mark’s account both consoles and challenges: if the Messiah himself suffered, then so might his followers, but suffering would not have the last word.
Discipleship, Misunderstanding, and Irony
A striking motif running through Mark’s Gospel is the persistent failure of even Jesus’ closest followers to understand him. The disciples often miss the point, squabble about status (Mark 9:34), and eventually abandon him (14:50). This theme of misunderstanding serves several purposes: it humanises the disciples, provides a realistic model of faith-in-progress, and ironically highlights the true meaning of Jesus’ identity—something only fully grasped in light of the crucifixion and resurrection.For Mark’s audience, this element would have been deeply encouraging. It reminds readers that confusion, fear, and even failure are part of the journey towards understanding, and that discipleship is ultimately a call to faith and service, not to instant comprehension.
Rate:
Log in to rate the work.
Log in