How Human Activity Shapes Evolution, Biodiversity and Genetic Resistance

This work has been verified by our teacher: 22.01.2026 at 9:34

Homework type: Essay

Added: 19.01.2026 at 7:40

Human Influences on the Environment: Biological Consequences and Challenges

Human life and development are inextricably linked to the environment—but rarely is this a one-sided affair. In biological terms, “human influences” on the environment refer not just to visible disturbances such as pollution or habitat destruction, but also subtler phenomena: genetic shifts in populations, manipulated evolution through breeding, and the mounting crisis of biodiversity loss. The scope of our impact extends from the emergence of drug-resistant organisms to changes in the very tapestry of ecosystems. This essay explores how human activity moulds the evolutionary destinies of species, the genetic foundation of our food and animals, and the precarious state of biodiversity. By delving into issues such as genetic resistance, selective breeding, and extinction, this essay will ultimately argue that human intervention—both intentional and unintended—fundamentally reshapes the living world, presenting challenges that reach back to our own survival and well-being.

---

Genetic Resistance Arising from Human Activity

A notable British example is the resistance of brown rats to anticoagulant rodenticides such as warfarin. Originally deployed as an effective rodent control method, warfarin acts by interfering with vitamin K metabolism, essential for normal blood clotting. Soon after widespread use in the UK, resistant rats appeared, harbouring mutations in the VKORC1 gene. These mutations reduced warfarin’s effectiveness, allowing the resistant allele to increase in frequency. The phenomenon of heterozygote advantage—where individuals with one resistant and one non-resistant allele survive better than either homozygote—further complicated eradication efforts. However, resistance often comes at a cost: without warfarin, these same mutations can reduce fitness, showing the delicate balance wrought by our interventions.

Human efforts against pests are mirrored by our medical struggles. The story of antibiotic resistance in bacteria is arguably the most urgent public health crisis of our era. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), a common cause of hospital-acquired infections in the NHS, is infamous for its ability to withstand multiple classes of antibiotics. The mechanisms behind resistance are varied: altered target molecules, efflux pumps, and, crucially in bacteria, plasmid-mediated horizontal gene transfer. This enables resistance genes to leap not just within species but between them. Over-prescription in both human medicine and animal agriculture—where antibiotics have historically been used as growth promoters—has accelerated this evolutionary arms race.

Efforts to stem resistance have gradually entered public consciousness in the UK. Campaigns encouraging patients to “complete the course” of antibiotics, the appointment of antibiotic stewardship committees in hospitals, and regulation of agricultural antibiotic use highlight the multi-pronged approach necessary. Meanwhile, surveillance programmes monitor the spread of resistance genes, and public education campaigns help inform responsible behaviour, reminding us that the fight against resistance is not solely scientific but social and political as well.

This section illustrates how quickly and unpredictably resistance can develop when faced with consistent human-driven selection. Ending these cycles requires a thorough understanding of both evolutionary biology and societal practice.

---

Human-Controlled Breeding and Genetic Manipulation in Agriculture

Selective breeding usually involves two main strategies. Inbreeding—the repeated breeding of closely related individuals—can solidify desired traits, but at the risk of “inbreeding depression.” This occurs when recessive detrimental alleles become homozygous, leading to decreased fitness, as seen in certain purebred dog breeds prone to hereditary disorders. Outbreeding, in contrast, introduces new genetic material, increasing heterozygosity and often leading to hybrid vigour, or heterosis. This approach boosts productivity and disease resilience, as seen in many modern crop varieties.

However, while monocultures and pure lines may seem advantageous in the short-term, they lose robustness in the face of changing conditions, pests, and diseases. The Irish Potato Famine in the 19th century starkly illustrated the perils of genetic uniformity in crops. In the UK today, government and industry maintain gene banks and heritage breed registries to safeguard genetic diversity in domesticated species, ensuring long-term adaptability.

Genetic engineering pushes this manipulation further, allowing for the insertion of desired genes directly into plant or animal genomes. While this biotechnological frontier offers solutions—disease-resistant crops or animals that produce less methane—ethical debates persist. Should we embrace genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in British fields, despite public scepticism and ecological uncertainty? Balancing food production, environmental impact, and public concerns remains a perennial challenge.

The environmental consequences of intensive, technologically advanced farming practices extend beyond genes. Fertiliser runoff, pesticide use, and habitat loss at the rural-urban fringe all diminish wider biodiversity. Sustainable agriculture in the UK increasingly seeks approaches such as integrated pest management, organic certification, and “rewilding” schemes to mitigate these effects—recognising that long-term productivity depends on robust soils, water quality and healthy ecosystems.

In sum, our ability to control the traits and composition of our crops and livestock both demonstrates our power and highlights our vulnerability. By shaping genetics, we alter the broader web of life and must do so with caution and foresight.

---

Human Activities Driving Extinction and Biodiversity Loss

Overexploitation also plays its part. Unsustainable fishing in the North Sea, for instance, led to the collapse of cod stocks in the late 20th century, requiring stringent quota systems to prevent irreversible loss. Hunting, though now tightly regulated in Britain, has left historical scars. Additionally, the introduction of invasive species—think of the impact of grey squirrels, originally brought from North America, on native red squirrel populations—undermines local ecosystems.

Why does biodiversity matter? A wealth of scientific literature shows that diverse ecosystems are more resilient to shocks, from disease to climate extremes. Ecosystem services—clean water, pollination, natural pest control—are underpinned by a rich tapestry of species. There are practical considerations as well: countless medicines in UK hospitals trace their origins to natural compounds first discovered in wild plants or fungi.

The consequences of biodiversity loss are not merely academic. The decline of pollinators such as bumblebees, for example, has immediate repercussions for British agriculture and, by extension, food security. Local extinctions can also have domino effects. When predators or keystone species disappear—such as the elimination of apex predators from British landscapes—ecosystems can unravel, resulting in overpopulation of certain species and habitat degradation.

Conservation responses in the UK include initiatives such as the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) reserves and the reintroduction of previously extinct species like the great bustard and white-tailed sea eagle. Captive breeding programmes, habitat restoration, and international accords like the Convention on Biological Diversity all play roles. Central to these efforts is the recognition that preserving genetic diversity is essential for population resilience and adaptability.

In summary, the struggle to halt biodiversity loss requires not only biology but an intersection with policy, culture, and economics, all centred around the stewardship of our natural heritage.

---

Interconnectedness of Human Actions and Biological Outcomes

Biodiversity loss loops back to human welfare in unpredictable ways, undermining ecosystem services essential to food production and disease control. As diversity thins, systems become brittle, less able to absorb and recover from disturbance. The risk of emerging zoonotic diseases—where infections jump from wildlife to people—rises as habitats shrink and species are forced into closer proximity to humans.

These biological interactions possess moral dimensions. The responsibility of current generations to maintain the quality and diversity of the natural world for those who follow is echoed throughout literature and policy, from the writings of environmentalist Rachel Carson, adopted in UK environmental campaigns, to the legal frameworks governing access to genetic resources. Questions of fairness arise—not simply who benefits, but who bears the burdens of environmental damage, whether locally in polluted communities or globally in the effects of climate change.

In conclusion, our choices, both as individuals and societies, make ripples through the living world, often returning with unforeseen consequences.

---

Conclusion

In navigating these issues, there are, as yet, no simple solutions. It will require global cooperation, continued research, enlightened stewardship, and a willingness to place the needs of future generations alongside our own. Only through such a holistic approach can we hope to safeguard not just the environment, but our own species as well.