Comparing Themes in the Poetry of Philip Larkin and Dannie Abse
This work has been verified by our teacher: 14.02.2026 at 12:22
Homework type: Analysis
Added: 12.02.2026 at 5:58
Summary:
Explore the key themes in the poetry of Philip Larkin and Dannie Abse, comparing identity, memory, and community in post-war British verse. 📚
Exploring Themes in the Poetry of Philip Larkin and Dannie Abse: A Comparative Analysis
Philip Larkin and Dannie Abse stand as central figures within the landscape of twentieth-century British poetry, each carving a unique space within the literary canon. Larkin, the quintessential English poet whose life and work were intimately connected with the city of Hull, is frequently regarded as a sceptical observer of post-war England, while Abse, shaped by a dual Welsh-Jewish heritage, infuses his verse with a profound sense of cultural and personal location. These poets’ backgrounds—so distinct in terms of geography, faith, and sense of community—inevitably inform their work, giving rise to contrasting yet occasionally convergent thematic concerns. Inquiring into the core motifs they explore not only enriches our appreciation of their poetry but also illuminates the shifting contours of identity, memory, and belonging in post-war Britain.
The aim of this essay is to provide a comparative analysis of the principal themes manifest in the work of Larkin and Abse, considering how the intersection of individual experience and broader cultural currents is refracted in their verse. Through detailed textual exploration and interpretive commentary, particular attention will be given to the significance of place and community, the construction of identity in relation to separation and belonging, attitudes toward love and familial relationships, the force of memory, the role of escapism, reflections on war, religion, and, inevitably, death. By examining both convergence and departure in their approach to such universal yet deeply personal themes, we may arrive at a nuanced understanding of their contributions to British poetry.
---
Place and Community
The question of 'place' courses through both Larkin’s and Abse’s poetry as a marker of identity and as a crucible for emotional experience. For Larkin, whose poems are famously rooted in the specificities of provincial England, place is often encountered with an air of irony, distance or even gentle resignation. ‘The Whitsun Weddings’, for example, depicts a train journey through the English countryside—an environment at once intimately familiar and peculiarly estranging. The ritual of marriage, observed from a detached vantage, becomes symbolic of both communal continuity and individual alienation. Larkin’s engagement with Hull, as in ‘Here’, finds an ambiguous lyricism in “isolate villages,” a phrase which communicates both distance and a muted affection for the “cut-price crowd” inhabiting these spaces.In contrast, Abse’s verse radiates an absorbing warmth, particularly toward South Wales, which emerges as a site not only of personal history but cultural pride. Poems such as ‘Return to Cardiff’ mourn the changes wrought by time, yet they pulse with a heartfelt sense of belonging and continuity: “the city drifts its white handkerchiefs of fog / and then the thought comes to me: / this is my city too, my past and all my people.” Abse’s connection to community, while suffused with nostalgia, is nevertheless rooted in the affirmation of Welsh identity, Jewishness, and the communal rituals that bind individual to collective past.
Thus, while Larkin more typically maintains a critical—sometimes wryly affectionate—distance from place and community, Abse seeks to preserve and celebrate his links, even as he scrutinises their limitations. Both, however, interrogate the way geography can shape a sense of self, alternately emphasising rootedness and displacement.
---
Separation, Alienation and Identity
Alienation—whether psychological, social or cultural—is a persistent motif in Larkin’s work. His speakers are often defined by emotional detachment, set apart from the lives they scrutinise. In ‘Mr Bleaney’, for instance, the persona occupies a bedsit once lived in by another, contemplating the empty routine that seems destined to repeat itself: “he stayed / The whole time he was at the Bodies, till / They moved him.” Larkin’s habit of standing aside from social engagement becomes a lens through which existential isolation is exposed, a posture both self-protective and deeply sad.Abse’s exploration of identity is less inwardly turned, yet marked by its own tensions. The son of Jewish immigrants in South Wales, he negotiates between belonging and outsiderhood. In ‘In the Theatre’, the act of observation becomes a metaphor for separateness, both as poet and as a cultural hybrid. The negotiation between his inherited Jewish traditions and the Welsh landscape produces a rich, ambiguous sensibility: “Between two worlds, / I balance on a wire, / a balalaika for a pole.” For Abse, separateness often emerges from external fault lines—cultural, religious, or historical—yet the tone is one of grappling, rather than resignation.
Both poets, therefore, display divergent forms of otherness: Larkin’s is anchored in temperament and philosophical outlook, while Abse’s is forged through the interplay of cultures and histories. Yet both, crucially, stay attuned to the paradox of seeking identification in a world marked by estrangement.
---
Young Love and the Experience of First Love
Larkin’s treatment of young love is best exemplified in poems like ‘Wild Oats’, where the disappointment of romantic idealism is communicated through candid recollection: “I was too selfish, withdrawn, / and easily bored to love.” With characteristic irony, he exposes the gap between emotional aspiration and reality, often depicting first love as fragile, fleeting and tinged with ruefulness.Abse, on the other hand, typically invests his recollections of early love with greater immediacy and a luxuriously sensory quality. In ‘Epithalamion’, Abse’s celebration of both heterosexual and same-sex intimacy is rendered with tenderness: “There is a mouth, there are two.” The language chosen is vivid, and the act of love is venerated as transformative and affirmative, even amidst the constraints of society’s expectations. Unlike Larkin, Abse is more willing to risk pathos and hope.
Despite the tonal variance, both poets ultimately present love as formative, shot through with innocence and exposed to disappointment. Yet while Larkin is dourly sceptical, Abse’s openness allows for richer, if sometimes painful, evocations. That both are shaped by their generation’s complex attitudes towards love, sexuality, and propriety is undoubted.
---
Mature Love and Long-Term Relationships
The passage from youthful infatuation to the complications of mature love is treated with distinctive inflections by both poets. Larkin’s ‘Talking in Bed’, for example, depicts the withering of intimacy over time: “It becomes still more difficult to find / Words at once true and kind, / Or not untrue and not unkind.” Here, marriage is not so much a place of solace as a stage for exposing miscommunication and emotional drift.Abse’s voice, in contrast, is often less bleak, drawing upon his own long marriage for inspiration. Poems such as ‘The Malham Bird’ explore, with unflinching honesty, both the strains and sustaining joys of commitment: “After so many years, still the same room, / the same late quarrels.” Despite moments of sorrow, Abse’s tone remains compassionate—permitting moments of humour, reconciliation, and acceptance.
The comparison here is instructive: Larkin’s portrayal remains reserved, almost clinical, whereas Abse’s is more confessional, investing mature love with a kind of enduring, complex grace. Each poet, however, is attuned to the inevitable negotiation between hope and disillusion that defines long-term relationships.
---
Family: Parents and Children
The family, as remembered or experienced, provides further ground for thematic divergence. Larkin’s reflections on family life, as in ‘Reference Back’, are sometimes coloured by nostalgia yet shaded with regret: “Truly, though our element is time, / We’re not suited to the long perspectives / Open at each instant of our lives.” The blurred line between duty, affection, and estrangement is everywhere apparent, echoing post-war anxieties around shifting familial norms.Abse’s treatment often emerges from the perspective of a father, mindful of his own childhood as well as his parental responsibilities. In ‘A Winter Visit’, memory is a bridge across generations, as Abse negotiates the challenge of connecting his past with the present reality of his own children. Through such reflections, he moves between history and immediate experience, crafting poems that are at once intimate and indicative of wider societal change.
Both poets thus use the family as a microcosm for broader concerns: the loss of tradition, the pressure of expectation, the painful shift of roles occasioned by the passage of time.
---
Memory and the Past
Larkin’s approach to the past is deeply tinged with melancholy. In ‘MCMXIV’, for example, a photograph conjures the lost innocence of pre-war England: “Never such innocence, / Never before or since.” The evocation of memory is not merely personal but quasi-historical, evincing a poignant yearning for vanished eras. Everyday objects and scenes—photographs, rooms, railway stations—serve as triggers for an acute sense of loss.Abse’s remembrance, by contrast, is typically more vivid and embodied. His poems treat memory as sensuously immediate: the feel of a Cardiff street, the taste of a festive meal, the sound of a chapel hymn. For Abse, memory often functions as a gateway to communal identity as well as personal recollection; the past is not only mourned, but actively summoned and cherished.
The use of imagery and texture—Larkin’s more muted and photographic, Abse’s more sensory and unguarded—serves to underline the respective poets’ attitudes to the past. Both, however, ultimately evoke memory’s power to shape the present, for good or ill.
---
Escaping Reality: Illusion and Imagination
Both Larkin and Abse are drawn to the idea of escape, though their attitudes diverge markedly. Larkin, in poems such as ‘A Study of Reading Habits’, frames books and daydreams as semi-ironic refuges from existence: “Get stewed: / Books are a load of crap.” The appeal of cinema, fantasy, and memory offers only limited relief and is often depicted as a symptom of an inability—or unwillingness—to confront reality.Abse, meanwhile, is gentler in his treatment of escapism. His celebration of collective amusements—football matches, childhood games, singing in chapel—presents illusion less as denial, more as communal balm or necessary respite. There is less irony, and more acceptance of the imaginative life’s necessity.
Why escape matters—whether as a palliative in the face of isolation or as a means of energising the ordinary—is a question both poets pose, each in their distinctive fashion.
---
War and Its Aftermath
Though neither Larkin nor Abse is famous as a war poet in the style of Owen or Sassoon, both are marked by the aftermath of conflict. Larkin’s encounters with war are oblique, lingering in the background of poems like ‘MCMXIV’. The loss and rupture are implied, less through direct address than through the absence of that which once was: community, safety, innocence.Abse is considerably more direct. In poems confronting the legacy of the Second World War, and with reference to Jewish suffering and post-war migration, he speaks of survivors, of displacement, and of the enduring shadow cast by violence. His poem ‘Two Photographs’ memorialises family lost in the Holocaust, while ‘In Llandough Hospital’ contemplates war’s cost in human terms.
Both poets, in registering the aftershocks of conflict, focus on ordinary lives, refusing the rhetoric of glory in favour of private pain, memory, and the lingering search for solace.
---
Religion and Spirituality
Faith, or the absence thereof, constitutes another significant axis of difference. Larkin, as in ‘Church Going’, is openly sceptical. He visits churches, not for worship, but with a mixture of curiosity and irony, pondering: “A serious house on serious earth it is.” Religion is emptied of transcendence, yet persists as a repository for human longing.Abse, while not conventionally pious, approaches spirituality from a myriad of angles—drawing upon Jewish celebrations, Welsh spiritual traditions, and a broader fascination with myth. In ‘Synagogue’, the act of worship, though purged of certainty, is invested with communal resonance and existential seeking.
Though neither poet professes doctrinal faith, both grapple with the questions posed by tradition, ritual, and mortality. Each, in his own fashion, uses religious motifs to meditate on the yearning for meaning.
---
Death and Dying
The spectre of mortality looms large in both Larkin and Abse, yet is addressed with notably different gestures. Larkin’s ‘Aubade’ is perhaps the most sustained meditation on death in his oeuvre, confronting agony and inevitability: “The sure extinction that we travel to / And shall be lost in always.” There is little comfort on offer, only an unflinching stare into the abyss.Abse, a medical doctor in addition to being a poet, approaches death with a companionable empathy. ‘In the Theatre’ offers an intimate portrait of loss observed, blending clinical knowledge with familial sorrow. His work is less given to metaphysical terror, more inclined toward compassion and dignity.
The means by which both poets evoke death—Larkin’s cold clarity, Abse’s warmth—are as distinctive as their voices, yet united in their refusal to sentimentalise.
---
Conclusion
In sum, the work of Philip Larkin and Dannie Abse—for all the differences in outlook, heritage, and poetic method—circles persistently around questions of place, belonging, love, memory, and mortality. Each writes, in his own register, of a world in flux, a society negotiating the legacies of war, rapid social change, and the uncomfortable certainties of faith and kinship. Where Larkin brings reserve, irony, and an unflinching honesty, Abse adds warmth, richness, and a keener sense of cultural rootedness.Their poems, read side by side, offer a subtle corrective to one another: Larkin’s scepticism leavened by flashes of yearning, Abse’s sentiment balanced by clear-eyed acceptance. As we contend with our own communal and personal histories, their insights into the experience of being British—however conflicted, however plural—remain invaluable. In so doing, both poets have assured themselves of lasting relevance, not merely as commentators on their contemporaries, but as companions for all those seeking to understand the joys and sorrows of the human lot.
Rate:
Log in to rate the work.
Log in