Decision Maths for A-level: Key algorithms and practical applications
This work has been verified by our teacher: 22.01.2026 at 3:17
Homework type: Essay
Added: 18.01.2026 at 9:50
Summary:
Explore key algorithms in Decision Maths for A-level and learn practical applications like shortest paths and minimum spanning trees for real-world problems.
Decision Maths: Algorithms, Applications, and Analysis
Decision Mathematics, often referred to as Discrete or Algorithmic Mathematics, emerges as a distinct pillar within the landscape of A Level Mathematics in the United Kingdom. Concerned less with abstract equations and more with practical problems, Decision Maths centres around the art of efficient choices: Which route delivers parcels the quickest? How can all sections of a town’s grid of roads be gritted with minimum retracing? Which technique sorts exam results the fastest? At its core, Decision Mathematics provides students with the tools to tackle such challenges through algorithmic thinking—a fusion of logic, process, and mathematical reasoning.
The subject stretches across a variety of topics, from identifying shortest paths in weighted graph models to tackling the famously intractable Travelling Salesman Problem. By blending systematic procedures with intelligent shortcuts—algorithms—decision maths equips us to model and solve concrete problems in logistics, transport planning, network design, and even everyday repairs. In this essay, I shall explore the principal algorithms, their stepwise workings, and their relevance in the real world, while also offering a balanced critique of their strengths, limitations, and significance within both academic and practical contexts.
---
1. Weighted Graphs and Networks
To tread into the territory of Decision Maths is first to become familiar with the language of graphs and networks. At their heart, graphs are sets of *vertices* (nodes, or points) connected by *edges* (lines, or links). When these edges are ascribed a value—distance, cost, time—they are called weighted graphs. Graphs can also be *directed* (where edges have specified directions, like one-way roads) or *undirected* (allowing movement in either direction).A particularly important structure within graph theory is the *tree*: a way of connecting all vertices together without forming cycles (closed loops). Special among trees are those that accomplish this with the least total weight: *minimum spanning trees* (MSTs). Cycles, incidentally, play a key role in determining the traversability of graphs, as we shall see with Eulerian paths.
Applications of these network models abound. BT Openreach, for example, dreams up the optimal way to wire whole neighbourhoods using MSTs, while urban councils apply such graphs to streamline snow plough or refuse collection lorry routes. Even within a school, mapping out fire escape routes or the most efficient delivery of exam papers between rooms unknowingly involves graph-theoretic thinking.
---
2. Minimum Spanning Tree Algorithms
The aim of finding a minimum spanning tree is, quite simply, to connect every point in a network at the lowest possible cost, *avoiding cycles*. Several algorithms contend for this task, but Prim’s and Kruskal’s are staples of the A Level curriculum.2.1 Prim’s Algorithm
Prim’s algorithm is somewhat reminiscent of ripples in a pond. We begin at any chosen vertex, then repeatedly expand our ‘tree’ by adding the cheapest available edge linking a new vertex outside the current tree. At each step, care must be taken not to form a cycle—lest we end up backtracking unnecessarily.Step-by-step: 1. Mark the chosen start vertex. 2. Identify all edges connecting the existing tree to unvisited vertices. Select the cheapest such edge. 3. Mark the newly reached vertex and repeat. 4. Continue until all vertices are included.
Consider a simplified road network: four towns (A, B, C, D), connected by roads with distances AB: 5, AC: 8, AD: 12, BC: 3, BD: 7, CD: 4. Starting from A, Prim’s algorithm would select AB (5), then BC (3), then CD (4), linking all towns with a total distance of 12—much less than if we had simply chained the nearest available road at each step.
The process is helped along by an adjacency matrix (a table of weights), and, for large graphs, a *priority queue* can efficiently hold candidate edges. Prim’s shines with dense graphs but does require a choice of start vertex, which can make its output deterministic only if all edge weights are unique.
2.2 Kruskal’s Algorithm
Kruskal’s algorithm, by contrast, is less anchored and more global. It picks the lowest-weight edge wherever it appears in the network, then the next lowest, and so on—adding each, provided that doing so does not form a cycle.Step-by-step: 1. List all edges in increasing order of weight. 2. Starting from the smallest, add each edge if it links previously unconnected vertices (i.e., does not close a loop). 3. Continue until exactly (number of vertices - 1) edges are included.
In practice, ensuring cycles are not formed (especially in larger graphs) requires a careful method, such as a *Union-Find* structure. Kruskal’s approach is particularly efficient for sparse graphs—a situation common in road planning in rural areas. Unlike Prim’s, Kruskal’s does not mind where you start, making it useful when no single 'hub' exists.
---
3. Shortest Path Problems
Minimum spanning trees ensure connectivity at minimal overall cost, but what if we need the shortest route from A to B, perhaps to respond to a medical emergency? Here, the challenge shifts: we no longer require all points to be linked, but instead demand the minimum-distance path between two specific points.3.1 Dijkstra’s Algorithm
Dijkstra’s algorithm revolutionised the field in the 1950s by providing a foolproof method for this problem, as long as all edges carry non-negative weights.How it works: 1. Assign a temporary distance to each vertex: zero for the start, infinity for all others. 2. Select the unvisited vertex with the smallest temporary distance. 3. For each neighbour of this vertex, calculate the distance through it. Replace the neighbour’s distance if this route is shorter. 4. Mark this vertex as ‘visited’ (finalised) and repeat. 5. Continue until the destination is reached or all routes are exhausted.
A classic example would be a bus network: finding the quickest journey from Barking to Bethnal Green. By systematically labelling each bus stop with its shortest known travel time, Dijkstra’s method ensures that when Bethnal Green is ‘visited’, the best route has been found. This technique underpins not only journey planners but also navigation in telecommunications.
However, Dijkstra’s has limitations: it falters with negative edge weights (which thankfully don’t arise in most physical problems), and it can become computationally heavy for very large systems.
---
4. Eulerian Paths and the Chinese Postman Problem
An Eulerian path, named after the Swiss mathematician Leonhard Euler, refers to a route which travels along every edge in a network exactly once. The conditions under which such paths or ‘Eulerian circuits’ exist are historical: Euler himself solved the puzzle of traversing every bridge in Königsberg without recrossing.- If all vertices have *even degree* (an even number of connections), an Eulerian circuit exists. - If exactly two vertices have *odd degree*, an Eulerian path but not a circuit is possible. - Otherwise, such paths are impossible without repetition.
Unfortunately, most real-life networks don’t play nice. The *Chinese Postman Problem* generalises: What is the shortest route that covers every edge (e.g., every street in a village) at least once and returns to the start? The key trick is to pair up the odd-degree vertices (which cause the problem) and add duplicate edges along the shortest paths connecting them, thereby ensuring all degrees become even.
Determining the optimum pairing—rather like arranging dance partners at a ball—can be labour-intensive for larger graphs. Once done, the postman’s augmented path guarantees full coverage with minimum retracing. Local authorities solving winter gritting or litter collection routes routinely rely, perhaps unwittingly, on such methods.
---
5. Travelling Salesman Problem (TSP)
The Travelling Salesman Problem is the stuff of legend for both mathematicians and logistics managers alike. The task: starting and ending at one point, visit every other location exactly once, with the minimum total distance. Yet, as cities and delivery points grow, the number of possible routes explodes exponentially, making exact solutions impractical when the numbers climb.5.1 Upper Bound Algorithm (Nearest Neighbour)
A popular heuristic for TSP is the *nearest neighbour* approach: always visit the nearest unvisited location next; once all are visited, return home. This can be visualised using matrices—scratching out columns as places are visited.While fast, nearest neighbour can give suboptimal results, as early poor choices might lock the traveller into inefficient end-of-route sweeps. Yet, the simplicity and speed recommend it in scenarios where fast, ‘good enough’ results trump exhaustive perfection.
5.2 Lower Bound Algorithm
The *lower bound* method provides an ‘at least as low as’ figure for route comparison. It calculates a minimum spanning tree on all points except the start, then adds the cost of returning to the start from the two nearest nodes. This establishes a benchmark: no tour can be shorter than this sum.Such bounding is invaluable in branch-and-bound strategies and for testing the specialness of a heuristic route found by nearest neighbour. Where perfection is too costly, good estimates gain practical value.
---
6. Sorting Algorithms in Decision Maths
While often overlooked amid headline-grabbing pathfinding methods, sorting underpins much of decision mathematics. Efficient orderings enable faster searches, quicker matchings, and speedier updates.Metrics matter: Every algorithm’s trading currency is the number of comparisons and swaps—the fewer, the better for large datasets.
6.1 Bubble Sort
Bubble sort is the classic—if blunt—starter: it repeatedly steps through a list, swapping adjacent items if they are in the wrong order, until no further swaps are needed. While memorable for its simplicity and utility as a teaching tool, its efficiency (O(n²)) falters with anything bigger than a revision card deck.6.2 Shuttle Sort (Cocktail Shaker Sort)
Shuttle sort refines the process, moving forwards and backwards across the list in search of misplaced items. This slight sophistication helps for nearly-sorted lists, saving unnecessary passes—but ultimately it too is limited, eclipsed by faster methods like quicksort or merge sort in professional contexts.---
7. Comparative Analysis and Algorithm Efficiency
One of the joys—and headaches—of Decision Maths is the task of selecting the right tool for the problem at hand. Should you use Prim’s or Kruskal’s for your network? Bubble, shuttle, or insertion sort for your lists? The answer rests on a balance of graph density, data scale, and urgency for absolute optimality.Efficiency is often compared using *Big O* notation: a way of thinking about how running time grows with input size. Bubble sort is O(n²), Dijkstra’s and Prim’s can be O(n²) too (though improvements exist), and near-exact TSP solutions are typically unmanageable beyond 10-20 nodes due to their O(n!) growth.
Simplicity is sometimes worth the slight loss of efficiency, particularly in educational contexts—hence bubble sort’s enduring popularity in lessons, despite its weaknesses. Real-world applications, however, mean trade-offs: a postal route involving hundreds of deliveries won’t tolerate bubble sort’s leisurely pace, and so smarter algorithms must be selected.
---
Conclusion
The world we inhabit is woven from networks—roads, wires, relationships, processes. Decision Mathematics equips us to navigate these networks not by guesswork, but by systematic, logical methods: finding the shortest paths, the most efficient routes, and the best orderings. Algorithms like Prim’s, Kruskal’s, Dijkstra’s, and the tools crafted to tame the TSP and Chinese Postman Problem, show how logic and mathematics spill into the everyday.While challenges remain—scalability, computational expense, and the ever-present urge for quicker, smarter techniques—the field continues to evolve. New heuristics and the promise of machine learning bring hope for previously insoluble problems. For the student or practitioner, the greatest reward might be the clarity of thought gained: mastering algorithms sharpens not only calculation, but decision-making itself.
The heartbeat of Decision Maths, then, is its marriage of structure and creativity—systems that save time, resources, and effort, and a reminder that even the most complex journeys can be tamed, step by step, by a well-chosen algorithm.
---
*Word count: Approximately 2100 words*
Rate:
Log in to rate the work.
Log in