An Inspector Calls themes: responsibility, class and morality

This work has been verified by our teacher: 22.01.2026 at 4:11

Homework type: Essay

Added: 18.01.2026 at 17:10

Summary:

Explore key themes in An Inspector Calls including responsibility, class, and morality to deepen your understanding and enrich your essay answers.

Themes within An Inspector Calls — An In-Depth Exploration

Introduction

J.B. Priestley’s *An Inspector Calls* occupies a unique space in British literature, blending elements of detective drama with searing social commentary. Though set in 1912, just before the First World War, the play was written and first performed in 1945, marking the end of another global conflict. This dual perspective—Edwardian England viewed through the lens of post-war Britain—shapes the play’s thematic resonance. Priestley was deeply concerned with the moral fabric of society and the responsibilities individuals hold towards one another, particularly at a time when class divides remained entrenched. In this essay, I will examine four core themes that underpin the drama: responsibility, social class and political ideology, morality and justice, and gender roles. Each theme functioned not merely as reflection of the era Priestley depicted, but as a challenge to the attitudes and customs of his own and future generations, which explains the enduring presence of the play in UK classrooms today.

I. Responsibility and Duty

Personal versus Collective Responsibility

At the heart of *An Inspector Calls* lies an interrogation of what it means to be responsible. Priestley explores the duality of responsibility, contrasting the individual duty one owes to family or self with a broader, collective responsibility to the wider community. This philosophical tension is evident even before the Inspector’s arrival, as Mr Birling boasts about the primacy of self-interest, declaring, “a man has to mind his own business and look after himself.” The play, however, dismantles this notion through the Inspector’s assertion that “we are members of one body. We are responsible for each other.” Here, Priestley challenges the audience—particularly those in a post-war, increasingly welfare-minded Britain—to question the limits of their own moral obligations.

Characters as Vessels of Responsibility

Every principal character symbolises a different stance on the question of duty. The Inspector, enigmatic and unwavering, acts as the voice of societal conscience. Unlike the other characters, his focus extends beyond the immediate family to the fate of Eva Smith and, by extension, the vulnerable. Sheila’s journey is especially significant; initially naive and self-absorbed, she comes to accept her role in Eva’s demise, showing genuine remorse and an urge to improve. Eric, too, eventually faces up to his culpability, his breakdown displaying the destructive consequences of neglecting one’s moral responsibilities.

In stark contrast, Mr and Mrs Birling embody a refusal to accept responsibility, each deflecting blame to safeguard their reputation and social standing. Gerald Croft occupies a more ambiguous position, admitting fault yet simultaneously rationalising his behaviour, reflecting the struggle many face when tarnishing self-image or privilege is at stake.

Dramatic Techniques Illuminating Responsibility

Priestley employs a range of dramatic devices to bring this theme to life. The recurring motif of a “chain of events” illustrates how personal choices reverberate beyond one’s immediate surroundings. The interrogation format itself, with each character questioned in turn, mirrors a moral inquest, compelling both characters and audience to confront uncomfortable truths. The Inspector's authoritative tone and persistent questioning are designed to cut through excuses, acting as a clarion call for collective self-examination.

Reflection

Through the gradual transformation of characters like Sheila, Priestley suggests that social awakening, though painful, is possible. The play ultimately serves as a moral lesson, warning of the perils that await a society unwilling to embrace mutual responsibility.

II. Social Class and Political Ideologies: Capitalism versus Socialism

Historical and Political Backdrop

The tension between capitalist self-interest and emergent socialist ideals forms a central pillar of *An Inspector Calls*. Early 20th-century Britain was marked by rigid class divisions and political debates, epitomised by the struggle between the privilege of industrialists and the hardships endured by the working class. Priestley, a known advocate for socialist policies and founding member of the Common Wealth Party, filters these debates through the play’s dialogue and structure.

The Divide Between Classes

The Birlings are depicted as archetypes of upper-middle-class comfort and complacency, while Eva Smith is rendered with minimal stage presence to highlight her lack of agency—a victim of systemic inequality. The stark difference between the worlds they inhabit is underlined at every turn: for the Birlings and Gerald Croft, life is a succession of prosperous dinners and business deals, but for Eva, it is a struggle for survival, always contingent on the whims of those above her.

Capitalist Attitudes Examined

Priestley satirises Mr Birling’s faith in capitalism and individualism, most notably through the device of dramatic irony. When Birling confidently dismisses the possibility of war and extols the virtues of “community and all that nonsense,” the contemporary audience, aware of the two world wars that followed, recognises the arrogance and shortsightedness of such views. His conviction that self-advancement is the ultimate goal is tested—and invariably shown to be inadequate—by Eva’s tragic fate.

Socialism and Collective Welfare

The Inspector embodies socialist beliefs, most clearly articulated in his plea for unity: “We don’t live alone. We are members of one body.” His dialogues are heavily laced with imagery and metaphor, such as the famous “bees in a hive,” pointing towards interconnectedness and mutual dependence. Interestingly, the younger generation—Sheila and Eric—demonstrate a capacity for empathy, suggesting that progressive values are not simply ideological but generational.

The Ongoing Battle

The interplay between capitalist and socialist principles is not resolved by the play’s end, yet the Inspector’s voice lingers. Priestley uses this clash not simply to expose the moral bankruptcy of profound inequality, but to urge audiences toward a more compassionate vision of society—a notion echoed in Britain’s post-war Labour government and the founding of the welfare state.

III. Morality and Justice

The Nature of Morality and Justice

Another cornerstone of the play is the distinction between what is legally right and morally just. Priestley invites us to consider whether following the law alone is sufficient for a society, or whether a higher, ethical standard is necessary. The Inspector’s investigation is not a criminal inquiry in the traditional sense, but a reckoning with conscience.

Confrontations with Moral Failure

Every character is ensnared to some degree in the events leading to Eva’s death. Priestley uses each revelation not just as a plot device but as a means of testing the characters’ moral fibre. Confession is a pivotal part of this process—a cleansing act that brings possible redemption for some, like Sheila, but is entirely absent in others, such as Mrs Birling, who claims, “I’m Mrs Birling, you know. I can’t accept any responsibility.”

Social Hypocrisy Exposed

The play relentlessly exposes the hypocrisy of those who project an image of respectability whilst engaging in dubious acts. The Birlings’ insistence on family honour and decorum is repeatedly undermined by their complicity, whether through indifference or exploitation.

Inspector: Arbiter of Moral Justice

The Inspector functions like a secular angel of retribution. He dispenses judgement not with recourse to law but by appealing to the characters’ better selves—and, by extension, to the audience’s. Lighting changes and extended pauses during key speeches serve to heighten tension and force reflection, transforming the drawing-room into a courtroom of sorts.

Ambiguity and Audience Judgment

The play’s ending, where the Inspector’s authenticity is cast into doubt yet a real police call heralds a reckoning still to come, leaves the notion of justice tantalisingly unresolved. In this way, Priestley hands over the final judgement to the viewers, compelling them to grapple with what true justice entails.

IV. Gender and Social Expectations

Edwardian Gender Norms

Priestley’s portrayal of gender is closely tied to the realities faced by women in early 20th-century Britain. Employment opportunities and social standing for women, especially those of the working class like Eva Smith, were limited and frequently precarious. The play demonstrates how gender intersects with class to magnify vulnerability and shape expectations.

Female Agency and Power

Sheila Birling is Priestley’s most conspicuous challenge to social expectations. Initially consumed by petty jealousy, she quickly becomes the most self-aware member of the family, criticising her parents’ attitudes and revoking her engagement ring, symbolising her rejection of patriarchal constraints. In contrast, Mrs Birling wields a kind of social power rooted in her husband’s status, but she employs it to reinforce, rather than question, oppressive norms.

Eva Smith, though not seen, is physically present in the audience’s imagination as a symbol of everywoman—her invisibility a comment on how society marginalises those of her gender and class. The men in the play, meanwhile, maintain authority and dismiss female voices, as epitomised by Mr Birling talking over his daughter or Gerald seeking to 'protect' Sheila from unpleasant truths.

Critiquing Gender Inequality

Moments such as Sheila’s declaration that working-class women are “people” and “not cheap labour” highlight Priestley’s progressive stance, particularly in the context of the 1940s audience, just emerging from the war years in which women had proven essential in the workforce. The sartorial focus—Sheila’s interest in her dress, Eva’s dismissal for “impertinence” in a clothes shop—underscores the significance attached to female appearance and the penalties for deviation.

Solidarity and Division

In his female characters, Priestley both critiques the limits placed on women and explores how internalised social attitudes can undermine solidarity, as seen in Mrs Birling’s refusal to help Eva. The implication is clear: social progress is only possible when these boundaries are confronted collectively.

Conclusion

Through intertwining themes of responsibility, class conflict, morality, and gender, *An Inspector Calls* operates as both a period piece and a timeless mirror for society. Priestley’s exploration of these themes calls every audience—whether in post-war Britain, the present, or the future—to reflect critically on their own values and social structures. The play’s continued presence in the UK curriculum is thus no accident: it remains a pointed reminder that humanity’s betterment depends on embracing collective responsibility, pursuing justice, fighting entrenched inequalities, and challenging outdated social norms. Ultimately, Priestley’s drama calls for vigilance—a warning echoed in the Inspector’s chilling final words, reminding us that “if men will not learn that lesson, then they will be taught it in fire and blood and anguish.”

Example questions

The answers have been prepared by our teacher

What are the main themes in An Inspector Calls responsibility class morality?

The main themes are responsibility, social class and political ideology, morality and justice, and gender roles, each explored through character actions and societal critique.

How does An Inspector Calls explore responsibility and duty?

The play contrasts personal and collective responsibility, illustrating through characters how individual actions affect the wider community and emphasizing moral obligations.

What is the significance of social class in An Inspector Calls themes?

Social class underpins much of the conflict, with Priestley highlighting divisions between privileged industrialists and the less fortunate to critique social inequality.

How is morality presented in An Inspector Calls themes responsibility class and morality?

Morality is examined through the characters' willingness or refusal to accept blame, stressing the importance of conscience and ethical behaviour in society.

Which character best represents responsibility in An Inspector Calls themes?

The Inspector serves as the voice of societal conscience, urging all characters—and the audience—to acknowledge their collective responsibility.

Write my essay for me

Tagi:#literature #aninspectorcalls #themes