Exploring Memory: Key Concepts and Research in A-Level Psychology
This work has been verified by our teacher: 20.02.2026 at 17:54
Homework type: Essay
Added: 18.02.2026 at 8:07
Summary:
Explore key memory concepts and research in A-Level Psychology to understand coding, capacity, and duration of short-term and long-term memory effectively.
Understanding Memory: Structures, Processes, and Research in A-Level Psychology
Memory, the mental faculty by which we encode, store, and retrieve information, stands as one of the core topics in psychological study. It underpins not only our ability to learn but also our sense of personal identity and day-to-day competence. In British psychological education, memory is introduced early and explored in depth at A-Level because it forms the foundation from which more complex cognitive processes emerge. The study of memory does not simply satisfy academic curiosity; it holds significant practical value for education, awareness of memory disorders, and understanding everyday behaviour.
This essay will examine key features of human memory, particularly the ways in which information is coded, how much we can hold, and for how long. Drawing upon classic and contemporary research, the essay will unpack the differences between short-term and long-term memory, highlighting experimental evidence, strengths, and critical limitations. By referencing foundational studies and employing relevant examples, the discussion will critically evaluate the scientific contribution of memory research and its real world implications.
---
Theoretical Background: Memory Models and Key Terminology
The Multi-Store Model (MSM) of Memory
The starting point for much psychological understanding of memory is the Multi-Store Model proposed by Atkinson and Shiffrin in 1968. The MSM describes memory as comprising three distinct stores: sensory memory, short-term memory (STM), and long-term memory (LTM). Sensory memory briefly holds incoming information from the environment, which, if attended to, passes into STM—a system with limited capacity and duration. Through processes such as rehearsal, information is then encoded into LTM, a relatively permanent store.Defining Coding, Capacity, and Duration
- Coding refers to the form in which information is represented within a memory store, whether this be as sounds (acoustically), pictures (visually), or meanings (semantically). - Capacity concerns the amount of information which can be held at any one time. - Duration describes how long information remains available before it decays or is lost.Understanding these concepts is vital to appreciating the nuanced differences between STM and LTM. For instance, STM is typically characterised by a reliance on acoustic coding, a limited capacity (famously ‘7 ± 2’ items), and brief duration. In contrast, LTM is associated with semantic coding, substantial (essentially unlimited) capacity, and duration extending from hours to a lifetime.
---
Coding in Memory: The Form of Retained Information
Types of Coding
While information can be held in visual, acoustic, or semantic forms, psychological research has historically emphasised the acoustic and semantic methods. Visual coding, though present, contributes more in specific circumstances (such as recalling a friend’s face from a crowd).Baddeley’s Seminal Research
One pivotal study in British psychology is Alan Baddeley's (1966) investigation of memory coding. Participants were grouped and presented with lists of words: some lists were acoustically similar (e.g., cat, mat, pat), others semantically similar (e.g., big, huge, large). Participants then recalled these lists immediately or after a delay.Results revealed that those attempting immediate recall often confused acoustically similar words, supporting the view that STM primarily utilises acoustic coding. In contrast, delayed recall—thought to tap into LTM—was most affected by semantic similarity, suggesting LTM primarily codes by meaning.
Evaluation of Coding Research
Baddeley’s work remains influential for its use of controlled experimental methods, enabling clear distinctions regarding memory processes. The methodology’s clarity allows for robust inferences about different coding strategies. However, the study’s use of word lists—devoid of everyday relevance—casts doubts on ecological validity. It is questionable whether rote learning of words mirrors how we remember meaningful information such as directions or stories. To enhance relevance, future studies might integrate real-life tasks or emotionally meaningful stimuli, as day-to-day memory is rarely so abstracted from context.---
Memory Capacity: How Much Can We Remember?
Conceptualising Capacity in STM and LTM
Capacity has fascinated psychologists for over a century. STM is notably limited, with George Miller (1956) popularising the notion of a “magical number seven, plus or minus two.” In practice, this suggests people can hold between five and nine items at once. LTM, by contrast, is generally thought to have almost limitless capacity, with only retrieval problems preventing us from accessing memories.Jacobs’ Digit Span and Beyond
John Jacobs’ classic (1887) digit span study remains a staple of British psychology syllabuses. In this study, participants were asked to repeat increasingly long sequences of numbers or letters. The average span was around seven for letters, slightly higher for numbers—a finding still cited today. The digit span method gave a tangible and reproducible metric for STM's limits.Evidence from Sensory Memory: Sperling’s Grid
Sperling’s (1960) partial report technique, though conducted in the US, often appears in British texts for its illustrative value. Participants viewed grids of letters flashed for fractions of a second; they could typically recall one row when cued, implying that sensory memory momentarily holds much more information than can be reported before decay.Evaluation of Capacity Research
Early memory research suffered from the imprecision of the era’s technology, though the basic findings have been reaffirmed by modern studies with improved controls. Laboratory settings, free from everyday distractions, likely overstate true STM capacity. In classroom or workplace environments, interference from competing tasks further constrains our effective capacity, a consideration often neglected in laboratory conditions.---
Duration of Memory Stores: Temporal Boundaries
The Fleeting Nature of STM
STM is temporary. Peterson and Peterson’s (1959) British experiment remains a crucial demonstration: participants, presented with trigrams (three-letter nonsense sequences), had to recall them after varying intervals filled with unrelated tasks to prevent rehearsal. Accuracy plummeted after 18–30 seconds, confirming STM’s rapid decay if information is not actively maintained.The practical significance emerges in everyday activities: forgetting a telephone number moments after hearing it, for example, or struggling to recall instructions given seconds earlier.
LTM: Remarkable Persistence
LTM, in contrast, can contain memories for years and even a lifetime. Bahrick et al. (1975) conducted a notable study involving recall and recognition of people from school yearbooks, decades after graduation. British students often discuss this in lessons for its real-life focus. Participants recognised faces and names with considerable accuracy even after half a century, especially in recognition tasks. Unsurprisingly, accuracy was higher for recognition (seeing a face and identifying it) than for recall (producing a name from memory).Evaluation of Duration Studies
Peterson and Peterson’s tightly controlled method is lauded for demonstrating the role of rehearsal, though its use of meaningless trigrams arguably fails to represent natural memory use. Bahrick’s study, by contrast, enjoys high ecological validity—people do try to remember names and faces over decades—but could not eliminate confounds such as frequency of reunions or continued contact. Both studies show that rehearsal, emotional content, and everyday uses are crucial in determining how long information is retained.---
Short-Term Memory: Characteristics and Processes
Properties of STM
STM can hold a modest amount of information for a short period—usually up to 30 seconds—with acoustic coding most prevalent. Maintenance rehearsal, such as repeating a phone number, extends this window somewhat.Research Evidence and Everyday Methods
Glanzer and Cunitz (1966) examined the serial position effect, finding that when people learn lists, they best remember the first items (primacy, which enter LTM) and last items (recency, in STM). This supports the MSM’s division between stores. In real life, students use chunking—grouping of items into ‘chunks’ (e.g., learning a phone number as pairs rather than a string of single digits)—to overcome STM limits.Cognitive Strategies and Practical Implications
STM performance hinges on strategies like rehearsal or chunking, and is easily impaired by distraction. For students, this explains why focus and reduced interference are vital for learning and revision—strategies like mind-mapping or mnemonics are, in fact, practical applications of memory research.---
Long-Term Memory: Organisation and Function
Features and Structure
LTM boasts near-limitless capacity and duration. Semantic coding dominates—information is often stored by meaning—but other types exist, such as procedural or episodic memory (knowing how to ride a bicycle or recalling a birthday party). Deep, elaborative rehearsal—linking new information to existing knowledge—produces stronger, longer-lasting memories.Empirical Support and Real-Life Relevance
As discussed earlier, Bahrick’s research demonstrates the durability of LTM, though it also highlights common memory failures when cues are absent. Forgetting may occur not due to decay, but failure to retrieve—something familiar to students in exams when a piece of information “just won’t come” until later.Applications and Retrieval
Meaningful connections, emotional content, and the presence of retrieval cues (a certain smell, music, or physical environment) all bolster memory performance. Teachers often suggest revising in conditions similar to the test environment, or using personal relevance to make learning stick, all directly informed by memory research.---
Critical Evaluation and Synthesis
Strengths of Memory Research
Cognitive psychology’s insistence on controlled experiments has led to a clear mapping of basic memory processes. The MSM, though now refined, offered a framework that has guided decades of empirical work. The field’s willingness to combine artificial and naturalistic approaches strengthens its findings, ensuring theories are tested under varied conditions.Limitations and Modern Directions
Nevertheless, early research’s heavy reliance on artificial tasks means findings must often be treated as a simplified model rather than a comprehensive answer. The changing technological and cultural landscape—multitasking, online learning, phone use—demands updated research. Furthermore, variables like age, emotional state, or even cultural differences can shape memory in ways not always controlled in classic studies.Contemporary Views
Modern theories such as Baddeley and Hitch’s working memory model have deepened our understanding of STM’s complexity. Advances in neuroscience increasingly confirm behavioural findings, mapping out the brain regions associated with different memory types and revealing individual differences that challenge the notion of a ‘one size fits all’ model for memory.---
Conclusion
In summary, memory is a multi-dimensional construct comprising distinct stores, each with unique characteristics regarding coding, capacity, and duration. STM operates as a limited, short-lived system, while LTM provides an enduring record of experience, knowledge, and skill. Research, both classic and contemporary, has illuminated these features, though often constrained by the artificiality of laboratory methods.Memory research has shaped educational techniques, informed clinical practice, and underlines the ongoing importance of cognitive psychology in everyday life. As psychology continues to develop, future studies must strive for greater ecological validity and relevance to our increasingly complex and digital world.
An appreciation of memory’s complexity encourages not only scientific curiosity but also a critical, reflective outlook towards how we learn, remember, and make sense of our lives. For A-Level students and beyond, grappling with these ideas provides far more than exam success—it provides insight into the very nature of human experience.
Frequently Asked Questions about AI Learning
Answers curated by our team of academic experts
What are key concepts in A-Level Psychology memory research?
Key concepts include coding, capacity, and duration, which explain how information is represented, how much can be stored, and for how long in different memory stores.
How does the Multi-Store Model describe memory in A-Level Psychology?
The Multi-Store Model divides memory into sensory, short-term, and long-term stores, each with distinct characteristics and processes for encoding and retaining information.
What is the significance of Baddeley's research in A-Level Psychology memory studies?
Baddeley's research demonstrated that short-term memory uses acoustic coding while long-term memory relies on semantic coding, highlighting crucial differences between memory stores.
How do coding, capacity, and duration differ between short-term and long-term memory in psychology?
Short-term memory has limited capacity and brief duration, coding mainly acoustically, while long-term memory has large capacity, long duration, and uses semantic coding.
Why is studying memory important for A-Level Psychology students?
Understanding memory aids in learning, recognises memory disorders, and provides insight into daily behaviour, making it a fundamental part of A-Level Psychology studies.
Rate:
Log in to rate the work.
Log in