The Role of Attachment in Early Childhood Development and Psychology
Homework type: Essay
Added: today at 12:01
Summary:
Explore the role of attachment in early childhood development and psychology to understand how early bonds shape emotional growth and social skills.
Attachment: Foundations, Influences, and Significance in Human Development
Attachment can be understood as the enduring and deeply felt emotional bond that develops—most notably in infancy—between a child and their primary caregiver. This relationship, far from being one-sided, involves constant, reciprocated interaction that is crucial in shaping how a person navigates their social world. The importance of attachment reaches far beyond the early years: it underpins later emotional regulation, social relationships, and even psychological resilience. This essay will examine the intricate processes underlying attachment, considering early infant-caregiver interactions, stages in the growth of attachment, the varied roles played by different caregivers, insights gained from animal studies, and the major theoretical approaches used to explain attachment. The discussion will be situated within the context of British psychology and will reflect on the wide-ranging personal and societal consequences of how, and with whom, attachments develop.
---
Early Caregiver–Infant Interactions
At the heart of early attachment lies a mutual exchange between infant and carer. Traditional views once depicted infants as largely passive, but British research, such as the observational studies by Mary Ainsworth and the careful naturalistic work of John Bowlby, painted a more dynamic picture. Even in the first months of life, babies employ a repertoire of innate behaviours—such as crying, smiling, and grasping—which instinctively draw responses from adults.Non-verbal communication forms the scaffolding for these early interactions. It is striking, for instance, how infants just weeks old will match their carer’s facial expressions or gestures. This phenomenon, referred to as interactional synchrony—articulated in studies by Meltzoff and Moore—describes a form of finely tuned ‘dance’ between child and adult, with each mirroring the other’s vocalisations, facial expressions, and even body movements. These exchanges are more than cute routines: they foster shared attention, emotional warmth, and a sense of security, forming the emotional groundwork from which robust attachments can develop.
The emerging consensus is that the sensitivity and responsiveness of the caregiver—being attuned to the infant’s signals and needs—crucially shape the infant’s expectations about relationships, trust, and comfort. These earliest patterns of connection influence how children come to view not just their carers, but the wider world: as either a source of comfort and predictability, or, if inconsistent, as uncertain and potentially threatening.
---
Developmental Stages of Attachment
Attachment does not crystallise all at once, but follows a gradual progression through distinct stages. The initial orientation phase, evident within the first two to three months of life, sees infants generally responding to people and objects without strong preference, though even newborns will gaze longer at human faces than at inanimate objects, a tendency observed in the foundational research of Schaffer and Emerson.As infants grow, a stage of emerging preferences takes shape, typically around six weeks to seven months. Now, babies begin to display marked recognition of familiar individuals, greeting parents with smiles and increased eye contact—a clear sign they are beginning to discriminate among those who care for them. Still, at this point, the bonds are not yet exclusive.
The critical stage of clear-cut attachment arrives around seven to eleven months. Here, children seek to maintain close proximity to their chosen caregiver, often their mother or another primary carer. Separation from this person induces distress—a phenomenon known as separation anxiety—while strangers provoke wariness or even fear. The classic “Strange Situation” procedure, devised by Mary Ainsworth and used extensively in British settings, empirically demonstrated these behaviours and revealed distinct patterns of secure and insecure attachment.
Beyond nine months, infants develop the capacity for multiple attachments: they begin to form meaningful ties with fathers, siblings, grandparents, and other key adults. Each attachment serves different functions, offering security, stimulation, or guidance, and broadening the child’s social network—a finding with particular relevance to the increasingly diverse caregiver arrangements in modern UK families.
Observational studies, such as those carried out in Glasgow by Schaffer and Emerson, have played a vital role in mapping these developmental trajectories, emphasising that attachment is as much about direct experience and daily interaction as it is about biological predisposition.
---
The Role and Influence of Different Caregivers
Historically, psychology often privileged the role of mothers in attachment formation. This emphasis reflected social realities in postwar Britain: mothers were generally the main, and sometimes sole, consistent caregiver, a situation reinforced by economic necessity and prevailing norms regarding breastfeeding and childcare.However, recent perspectives highlight the importance of fathers and other attachment figures. British studies, such as those by Lamb, stress that fathers provide not just play and stimulation—the rough-and-tumble games for which they are stereotypically known—but can also offer sensitivity and emotional support. Evidence links paternal involvement to children's social competence and cognitive development, challenging the long-standing assumption that mothers alone determine attachment security.
The modern British family often encompasses more than two parents: step-parents, grandparents, nursery workers and childminders. Each can act as an attachment figure, providing stability and affection. However, the absence of a paternal figure, or weak bonds with fathers, has been linked in some research to higher levels of aggression and risk-taking, especially among boys. Conversely, warm, consistent involvement from multiple caregivers broadens a child’s resources for coping and builds resilience, providing them with a more secure base from which to explore the world.
---
Insights from Animal Studies
Not all our understanding of attachment is derived from studies of human infants. Classic animal research conducted in Europe, such as Lorenz’s work with greylag goslings, offered important analogies. Lorenz discovered that geese would ‘imprint’—form a rapid attachment—on the first moving object they saw after hatching, normally their mother but sometimes Lorenz himself. Imprinting only occurred within a ‘critical period’, highlighting the innate, biological basis of attachment behaviours.Further insight arose from Harlow’s notorious studies with rhesus monkeys, a frequent topic in British A Level Psychology curricula. Infant monkeys were presented with two surrogate mothers: one constructed from wire and another covered with soft cloth. While only the wire mother provided milk, the monkeys overwhelmingly preferred to nestle against the comforting cloth mother, clinging to her except when hunger forced them elsewhere.
These findings provided powerful evidence that attachment is about more than food: tactile comfort and emotional security are vital. Harlow also documented the longer-term effects of deprivation: monkeys deprived of a living mother showed severe social and emotional deficits, struggling to form normal relationships even as adults. While these animal studies elucidate the underlying processes, they also raise ethical and methodological questions: can animal research, with its artificial set-ups and ethical dilemmas, be relevant to complex human society?
---
Theoretical Explanations for Attachment
Two central frameworks have shaped our understanding of why attachment occurs. The learning theory approach, derived from behaviourist traditions, posits that attachment develops through association: the caregiver is linked with food, which satisfies hunger, and so becomes a source of comfort. Operant conditioning further suggests that the infant’s distress is alleviated by the caregiver’s actions, reinforcing the bond.However, this “cupboard love” theory has notable limitations. It cannot explain why children prefer comfort over sustenance (as seen in Harlow’s work) or the fact that children still form attachments to unkind or neglectful carers. Neither does it accommodate the emotional subtleties that define secure versus insecure attachment styles.
The ethological perspective, championed in Britain by John Bowlby, interprets attachment as an evolutionary adaptation: close bonds ensure an infant’s survival by keeping them near protective adults. Bowlby’s influential Monotropic Theory stressed that humans, like other animals, are born with a predisposition to form attachments, and that there is a sensitive period in which these bonds must be formed if normal development is to proceed. Bowlby’s work, buttressed by animal studies, revolutionised postwar British thinking on child rearing and child mental health.
More contemporary models draw on both traditions, incorporating cognitive processes—internal working models of self and others, developed through early relationships—into their explanations. These integrative models better account for the diversity of attachment experiences and the influence of wider social and cultural forces.
---
Applications and Real-World Implications
A clear understanding of attachment has had enormous influence on British social policy, education, and mental health care. Recognising the importance of secure attachments has shaped national campaigns to support parental leave, high-quality nursery provision, and targeted interventions for at-risk families. Educational professionals are trained to notice signs of attachment difficulties, and early intervention is prioritised for children in care, those affected by trauma, or those experiencing instability at home.Attachment research underpins the identification and treatment of disorders such as reactive attachment disorder, which can afflict children growing up in institutional or abusive settings. Timely, sensitive support can help such children form trusting relationships and avoid lifelong emotional difficulties.
More broadly, attachment theory illuminates the threads connecting early experience with later life: a securely attached child is, research suggests, more likely to grow into a confident, socially competent, and psychologically resilient adult. The lessons drawn from attachment studies have contributed to an appreciation of the emotional needs of all children, whatever their family structure, and have informed the shift in cultural attitudes towards the importance of sensitive caregiving, including by fathers and extended family members.
---
Rate:
Log in to rate the work.
Log in