How News Media Shape Moral Panics and Influence Social Perceptions
This work has been verified by our teacher: 15.01.2026 at 20:07
Homework type: Analysis
Added: 15.01.2026 at 19:20
Summary:
The news media shapes social reality and often sparks moral panics, influencing public opinion, policy, and social divisions in modern Britain.
The News and Moral Panics: Media Construction, Social Reactions, and the Dynamics of Deviance
It is scarcely possible to overstate the influence of the news media on the way we in Britain understand the world around us. As the daily headlines flash on our phones or on the television screen, there is often an unspoken assumption that what is being reported is the unvarnished truth—a straightforward window onto events as they happen. Yet, just beneath the surface lies something far more complex: the news is not a mere reflection of reality, but rather a product shaped by the choices, perspectives, and priorities of those who create it. This is nowhere more evident than in the phenomenon of ‘moral panics’—waves of intense public concern about perceived threats, which frequently emanate from the ways the media frame certain events or groups. This essay will examine the mechanisms by which news media construct social realities and generate moral panics, drawing on key sociological research as well as contemporary British examples. Through analysing both historical and recent cases, it will argue that the news is a powerful creator of consensus or conflict, while also considering how this dynamic is changing in the digital age.
---
The Nature of News Media: Construction over Reflection
Selection and Framing of News
Contrary to the idea that newspapers and broadcasters passively relay facts, every news report is the result of numerous editorial decisions. Editors and journalists must determine which stories are “newsworthy”—a process guided by factors such as drama, negativity, relevance to the British public, and the involvement of high-profile individuals. For example, a stabbing in a London borough might receive far more coverage than a road accident in a rural village, irrespective of the actual harm caused. This selection is neither neutral nor comprehensive: indeed, it often leads to the exclusion of less sensational, yet socially significant, events.The process of ‘framing’ goes further still. Headlines, images, and the very language used can cast events in particular lights—portraying some groups as hapless victims, others as dangerous threats. Consider, for instance, the terminology surrounding “migrant crises” or the deliberate use of words like “gang” in discussing youth violence, which conjure images of menace and disorder in the minds of readers.
Interpretative Reporting and Constructed Meaning
The interpretative aspect of news involves more than just the selection of facts; it is also the way those facts are presented, structured, and contextualised. Through recurring themes and symbolic representations, news coverage brings certain narratives to prominence. When the BBC or The Guardian runs a series on knife crime, the repetition and selection of statistics—and the inclusion of emotive testimonies—shape an almost cinematic image of daily life in some communities, irrespective of broader trends.Academic analysis, such as content or discourse analysis, has been invaluable in unpicking how news reporting can construct moral boundaries. This has been evident in press treatment of terrorist incidents in Britain, where the ethnicity or religion of the perpetrator has been highlighted or downplayed depending on wider political pressures or editorial stances.
The Implications of Media Construction
The upshot of these practices is that news is as much a social product as an account of reality. Editorial priorities and commercial imperatives (like the need to hold readers’ attention or satisfy advertisers) play a significant part. Political affiliations of particular outlets further colour their representations, whether subtly—as with The Times’ treatment of government policy—or more overtly, as seen with tabloid campaigns against “benefit scroungers”.In sum, unlike a mirror, news does not only reflect what is ‘out there’. It actively constructs reality, bringing order and meaning to the chaos of everyday life, but also—crucially—sometimes stoking fear and hostility in the process.
---
The Concept and Dynamics of Moral Panics
Defining and Understanding Moral Panics
The term ‘moral panic’—coined by sociologist Stanley Cohen in his now-classic *Folk Devils and Moral Panics*—refers to a situation in which a person or group is defined as a threat to societal values and interests; the threat is presented in a stylised and stereotypical way by the mass media, and public concern is aroused before policymakers intervene. Goode and Ben-Yehuda later outlined five fundamental features: (1) concern, (2) hostility, (3) consensus, (4) disproportionality, and (5) volatility.In practice, moral panics are rapid and sometimes short-lived but can leave lasting legacies in policy and public attitudes. They are marked by the denouncement of ‘folk devils’—groups blamed for perceived social breakdown—and an escalating process in which news coverage both shapes and responds to rising anxiety.
The Stages of a Moral Panic
The evolution of a moral panic is almost theatrical. First, an individual or group is identified as a threat (e.g., “feral youth” or “Islamic extremists”). The media then amplifies this threat through persistent, often sensational, reporting. This in turn draws a strong public reaction, as fear and calls for action grow louder. Ultimately, official bodies—police, courts, government—intervene, sometimes through new laws or crackdowns.Labelling theory explains how these “deviant” labels can spark a self-fulfilling prophecy: harsher enforcement and negative publicity can push those labelled further away from societal norms, a phenomenon Cohen described as the ‘deviancy amplification spiral’.
Social Functions and Consequences
Moral panics serve, paradoxically, to both divide and unify. They can reinforce social boundaries by declaring what is normal and what is not, thus shoring up a feeling of shared values. Yet, they also marginalise and scapegoat the powerless: marginal groups such as young people, migrants, or the working class are often cast as the villains. These dynamics are mirrored in policy changes—be it new stop-and-search powers for police or the introduction of harsher sentencing laws.---
Case Studies: Youth Subcultures and Moral Panics
Mods and Rockers: The Original British Moral Panic
No discussion of moral panics in the UK is complete without reference to the “Mods and Rockers” clashes of the 1960s, so vividly described by Cohen himself. Over Easter weekend at Clacton and in seaside towns like Brighton, groups of young people—distinguished by their dress and taste in music—were involved in disturbances. The press, however, seized on the events, depicting them not as isolated scuffles but as evidence of a nation descending into youthful anarchy.The reality was rather different: the actual damage was limited, and the majority of those present were well-behaved. Yet, the press’s use of terms like “riots” and emotive photos of police lines fuelled panic, prompting public outcry and an exaggerated police response. The effect was self-reinforcing—many young people, angered by their portrayal, became more confrontational, thus feeding the cycle of deviance and crackdown.
Youth and Ongoing Panics
This pattern repeated in subsequent decades: punks, skinheads, ravers, and “hoodies” have all taken their turn as folk devils. The 1990s saw hysteria over “acid house parties” while more recently, “drill music” has been blamed for violent crime among urban youth. The media’s fixation with negative aspects—while often ignoring the underlying social issues such as unemployment, lack of facilities, or institutional racism—demonstrates how moral panics blend social anxiety with cultural change.In the present era, youth are often cast as victims as well as villains—from panics about “grooming gangs” to concerns about mental health crises caused by social media. Policymakers now oscillate between punitive and protective interventions, illustrating the complex interplay between news framing and public reaction.
---
Broader Societal Moral Panics and Media Roles
Race and the ‘Black Mugger’ Panic
One of the most impactful British examples of moral panics beyond youth subcultures is the ‘black mugger’ panic of the 1970s, as analysed by Stuart Hall and colleagues in *Policing the Crisis*. Against a backdrop of economic instability and declining confidence in government, the media seized on a limited number of mugging cases—overwhelmingly attributing them to young black men. This not only exacerbated racial tension but also justified aggressive policing and hardline policies—a process Hall interpreted through a Marxist lens as reinforcing dominant power structures.Child Protection, Victim-centred Panics, and Drug Scares
There have also been repeated panics focused on child protection, most notably around child abuse by strangers or internet predators, and earlier, campaigns against “video nasties” in the 1980s. Here, the boundaries of moral panic shifted: rather than focusing solely on perpetrators as folk devils, the news emphasised innocent victims, thereby rationalising increased surveillance and censorship.Drug panics—ecstasy, heroin, and the recent ‘spice’ crisis in British prisons—demonstrate the persistent volatility of moral panics. Despite evidence of relative safety compared to other drugs, the press has repeatedly revived stories of drug-related youth danger, serving not only to sell papers but also prompting policy responses out of proportion to the actual scale of the threat.
---
Critical Evaluation and Theoretical Debates
Critiques and Limitations
While the moral panic model is powerful, it is not without critics. David Critcher, for example, argued that not every media-generated scare achieves the wide public consensus required to count as a true panic. The early framing of AIDS as a “gay plague” in Britain, for instance, stirred much prejudice, but substantial voices of opposition prevented the formation of a consensus panic.Furthermore, sociologists debate why only certain issues catch fire as moral panics—suggesting that underlying social anxieties, power relations, and historical context are just as important as media coverage itself.
Persistence, Recurrence, and Digital Age Dynamics
Contrary to the idea that moral panics are always brief, some fears—such as those surrounding asylum seekers—have persisted for decades, periodically resurging as circumstances change. The rise of social media has further complicated the picture: panics can now spread faster but also face immediate challenge and contestation from alternative voices. Consensus is harder to achieve, but the risk of fragmentation and polarisation is greater.The question of media responsibility in the age of ‘fake news’ is more urgent than ever, with calls for critical media literacy echoing through both schools and broader civic life.
---
Conclusion
In Britain, as elsewhere, the news media play a central part in creating the social reality we inhabit. Far from passively mirroring the world, news outlets actively select, shape, and frame events, often driving public opinion in the process. Nowhere is this clearer than in the dynamics of moral panics, where groups—from youth subcultures to ethnic minorities—become the focus of intense, often disproportionate, scrutiny and anxiety. These stories have real outcomes: in creating folk devils, the media also help create new policies, public fears, and social divisions.A nuanced understanding of moral panics is essential—not simply to critique the power of the press, but also to comprehend the anxieties and contradictions at the heart of modern Britain. As we move deeper into the digital era, the need for critical media literacy, grounded in sociological insight, has never been greater. Only by recognising the mechanics behind the headlines can we hope to resist unwarranted panic and protect those most vulnerable to society’s label of deviance.
Rate:
Log in to rate the work.
Log in