Aquinas' Fourfold Hierarchy of Law: Natural Law Explained
This work has been verified by our teacher: 2.02.2026 at 18:11
Homework type: Essay
Added: 30.01.2026 at 8:55
Summary:
Explore Aquinas’ Fourfold Hierarchy of Law and understand how Natural Law shapes ethics and legal principles in moral philosophy for UK students.
Aquinas’ Four Tiers of Law: A Critical Exploration of Natural Law Within Moral Philosophy
Few figures in the history of Western philosophy have left as indelible a mark on discussions of ethics and law as Thomas Aquinas, a Dominican friar writing at the heart of the 13th century. Working within the Dominican tradition and drawing deeply on the philosophy of Aristotle, Aquinas constructed a far-reaching framework for understanding law, morality, and the relationship between divine order and human action. His work, especially as collected in the _Summa Theologica_, remains a touchstone for ethical debates in the United Kingdom and beyond, underpinning much of the discourse in A Level Religious Studies and in legal theory. This essay aims to unravel Aquinas’ hierarchy of law—Eternal Law, Divine Law, Natural Law, and Human Law—giving particular attention to Natural Law, its philosophical underpinning, and its enduring relevance. Further, it will weigh Aquinas’ system against critical, especially existentialist, perspectives and examine its implications within contemporary society.
Aquinas’ Understanding of Law: Reason and Order
For Aquinas, law was not simply a set of arbitrary rules imposed for convenience. He described law as “an ordinance of reason for the common good, made by him who has care of the community.” This “ordinance of reason” is significant: Aquinas saw human beings as rational creatures, and reason as the crucial faculty by which we participate in the moral order of the universe. The law, in this sense, is more than a social contract or an instrument of power. Rather, it is fundamentally about ordering conduct in a way that reflects the rational structure of the cosmos, aiming always toward the flourishing of individuals and society. This view is echoed in the British legal tradition, where the concept of justice is inextricably linked to reasonableness rather than mere precedent or authority.Aquinas organised the types of law in a hierarchical fashion: at the summit sits Eternal Law, followed by Divine Law, Natural Law, and finally Human Law. Each type is interdependent, forming a ladder by which humans access and participate in universal truth.
Eternal Law: The Foundation of Everything
At the root of Aquinas’ legal structure lies Eternal Law: the overarching, unchanging principle of order through which God governs the entire universe. This “law” is not written in books or engraved on tablets; it is the underlying reason of God, the blueprint of creation itself. Eternal Law is timeless and absolute, shaping the operation of the natural world as much as human morality.Aquinas contended that while the fullness of Eternal Law is beyond human comprehension, its effects are visible in the orderliness of creation—seen, for example, in the predictable cycles of nature, the rationality of the human mind, and even in the basic structures of animal behaviour. This notion parallels the ancient Greek perception of a _logos_, or rational principle, guiding the cosmos. In a British context, one might draw literary analogies to the regularity and design found in Spenser’s _The Faerie Queene_, where disorder is unnatural and evil is always a perversion of the good order.
However, as mere mortals, humans cannot apprehend the whole of Eternal Law directly. We are only able to catch glimpses of it, reflected through the filters of reason and revelation—hence the need for the further tiers of law.
Divine Law: Revelation for Human Understanding
Where Eternal Law is vast and mysterious, Divine Law is specific, personal, and revealed through sacred texts and religious experience. Divine Law, for Aquinas, is necessary because human reason is clouded by ignorance and passion, leaving us prone to moral mistakes. Divine Law comes to humanity primarily through revelation—paradigmatically in Christian belief through the Bible, but in a broader context through any direct communication by God to humans.The classic instance of Divine Law in English culture is the Ten Commandments, which have shaped Christian moral teaching and even the broader civic values of the United Kingdom for centuries. These commandments state plainly what Natural Law holds implicitly—for example, “Thou shalt not kill” aligns with the rational imperative to preserve life. Thus, Divine Law does not override Natural Law, but rather clarifies, supplements, and reinforces it, particularly in areas where purely rational interpretation might falter (such as the intricate demands of worship or the forgiveness of enemies).
One challenge faced by Divine Law, particularly in the UK’s increasingly pluralistic society, is the coexistence of multiple religions, each claiming different revelations. Moreover, vast numbers of Britons identify as secular or follow no religion at all—raising the concern that reliance on Divine Law might exclude significant portions of the population from shared moral guidance.
Natural Law: The Moral Compass Shared by All
Natural Law occupies a special place in Aquinas’ system, functioning as the linchpin between the divine order of creation and everyday human conduct. For Aquinas, Natural Law is the participation of rational creatures in the Eternal Law. By virtue of our reason, all humans, regardless of religious background, can apprehend fundamental moral truths. In other words, we are equipped with an inbuilt moral compass, rooted in the very fabric of what it means to be human.The primary precepts of Natural Law, according to Aquinas, revolve around the preservation of life, procreation, the education and care of children, living in societies, and seeking truth, especially about God. In Britain, these precepts continue to undergird much of our approach to morality, regardless of one’s individual faith—or lack thereof. Modern debates on the NHS, the right to life, the importance of education, and the protection of vulnerable populations all echo these ancient inclinations.
Crucially, Aquinas held that Natural Law was both unchanging and universal. Although human societies may fail to enact good laws, or individuals may choose to violate natural precepts (for example, through theft or murder), the underlying moral law remains unalterable. This view gave medieval Europe, and later Enlightenment thinkers like John Locke, the philosophical underpinning for universal human rights—a concept formalised in British legal history through documents such as the Magna Carta and, later, the Human Rights Act 1998.
Applying Natural Law to daily living, one might consider a common moral dilemma, such as whether to tell the truth in a difficult situation. Natural Law reasoning would urge honesty as a fundamental good, essential for trust and social cohesion. Yet Aquinas also recognised the complexities of human life, acknowledging that secondary precepts (such as “do not lie”) sometimes require careful interpretation in light of exceptional circumstance.
Human Law: Legislation and its Limits
Human Law, the final tier of Aquinas’ structure, is the body of statutes and rules created by societies to regulate conduct. In the British legal system, this tier finds its manifestation in an ever-evolving patchwork of Parliamentary acts, statutes, and common law judgments. For Aquinas, legitimate Human Law must be derived from and consistent with the tenets of Natural Law; laws that deviate from natural justice (such as those legalising slavery or unjust discrimination) are, in his view, not true laws at all.This notion continues to inform contemporary legal debates in the UK. For instance, the decriminalisation of homosexuality in the 20th century and the ongoing struggle for human rights protections for minorities can be viewed through an Aquinian lens as attempts to bring Human Law into closer alignment with universal moral principles—ultimately, the preservation of dignity and equality.
However, Human Law is by necessity flexible and responsive to changing circumstances, unlike the immutable structure of Natural or Eternal Law. The British legal system’s reliance on precedent and parliamentary sovereignty acknowledges this, allowing laws to be revised and abolished in response to new evidence or moral insight, as seen in the abolition of capital punishment or the reform of family law.
Critical Perspectives and Contemporary Relevance
Aquinas’ teleological view—that everything in nature, including morality, has a purpose—has been sharply criticised, particularly by existentialists such as Jean-Paul Sartre. Sartre’s mantra that “existence precedes essence” directly challenges Aquinas’ conviction that human nature is fixed and ordered towards certain universal goods. In this view, there is no predetermined “human essence”; instead, individuals are radically free to choose their own meaning and values. Such positions question whether Natural Law can truly be universal or binding in a society that values pluralism and personal autonomy, as is increasingly the case in modern Britain.Furthermore, legal positivists—among them the influential English jurist H.L.A. Hart—have argued that the law should be separated from morality, emphasizing instead the procedures and conventions by which laws are created. This tension plays out in ongoing debates about controversial issues such as euthanasia, abortion, and marriage, where appeals to Natural Law can be seen as both a source of moral clarity and, for some, a hindrance to social progress.
Despite these critiques, Natural Law continues to exert a strong influence on discussions of rights and justice in the UK. The very foundations of the rule of law, the inviolability of human dignity, and the pursuit of “the good society” draw on Aquinas’ insistence that reason must have a central place in both personal and collective morality.
Conclusion
In summary, Aquinas’ four-tiered model of law offers an integrated vision linking cosmic order, divine command, human reason, and legislative authority. At the heart of this structure lies Natural Law, a concept both subtle and profound, which seeks to bridge universal precepts with the messy reality of human life. While Aquinas’ ideas have been challenged by later philosophers and by the evolution of British society, his insistence on the role of reason, the dignity of the human person, and the search for a just order remains strikingly relevant.In a time when many feel adrift amid moral uncertainty, Aquinas' framework is a reminder that some questions—and some answers—belong not only to tradition or authority, but to reason itself. Whether or not one accepts his conclusions in full, engaging with Aquinas is to participate in an ongoing conversation about what it means to live rightly. The challenge for today’s students, lawmakers, and citizens is to exercise their reason in the defence and pursuit of the good, as Aquinas imagined centuries ago—and to continue refining law to meet the evolving needs of all.
Rate:
Log in to rate the work.
Log in