Mass Media in Modern Britain: Ownership, New Media and Globalisation
This work has been verified by our teacher: day before yesterday at 18:36
Homework type: Essay
Added: 21.01.2026 at 13:10
Summary:
Explore the roles of media ownership, new media, and globalisation in shaping modern Britain’s mass media landscape and its impact on society.
Mass Media Overview: A Critical Analysis of Media Ownership, New Media, and Globalisation in Contemporary Society
Mass media, encompassing a vast array of communication platforms such as broadcast television, print newspapers, digital media, and social networking sites, is a central force in shaping contemporary British society. It not only informs, entertains, and educates the public, but also acts as a powerful instrument in the construction of social values, political attitudes, and cultural tastes. In an era of rapid technological transformation and increasing global connectivity, understanding the intricate realities of mass media ownership, control, and evolution is indispensable to any sociological inquiry. The changing landscape of the media sector—marked by economic concentration, digital innovation, and transnational flows—raises profound questions about democracy, cultural identity, and socialisation.
This essay offers a comprehensive analysis of mass media through three main lenses: firstly, examining how ownership and control structure the diversity and ideology present in media content; secondly, considering the rise and impact of new media forms on both audiences and producers; and thirdly, exploring the relationship between mass media, globalisation, and popular culture in a world where boundaries are increasingly porous. Throughout, I draw upon UK-centric examples—such as the BBC and British press empires—as well as sociological theories that shed light on the complex interplay between power, social identity, and the everyday lived realities of media users.
---
I. Ownership and Control of Mass Media
A. Types of Media Ownership
1. Private Ownership
The British media landscape has long been shaped by private enterprise, notably through large conglomerates such as News UK, a subsidiary of News Corp, which controls influential newspapers like The Times and The Sun. This model is fundamentally commercial, driven by the imperative to secure audiences and generate profit. While competition can lead to innovation and a plurality of voices, there are legitimate concerns that profit-driven motives may narrow editorial diversity, prioritising sensationalism and popular appeal over balanced reporting or minority viewpoints.2. State Ownership and Public Service Broadcasting
In contrast, public service broadcasting (PSB), as embodied most clearly in the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), is tasked with serving the public good by providing impartial, high-quality content across a range of genres. Unlike its commercial competitors, the BBC's funding (mainly via the licence fee) and governance are designed to secure independence from both market and governmental pressures. Nonetheless, PSB faces continuous scrutiny regarding political interference—be it perceived or real—as well as ongoing debate surrounding accountability and funding models, especially in an age of digital disruption.3. Mixed and Hybrid Models
Beyond the binary of public and private, the UK also features hybrid models, such as Channel 4, which is publicly owned but commercially funded. Such arrangements can offer editorial independence while retaining some public interest obligations, yet they grapple with their own tensions—most notably, striking a balance between serving niche interests and chasing high ratings to secure advertising revenue.B. Trends in Media Ownership and Control
1. Concentration and Consolidation
Over recent decades, the consolidation of media ownership has provoked alarm about declining plurality. Large groups increasingly absorb once-independent outlets, creating so-called media oligopolies. According to OFCOM, three companies now command around 70% of the UK’s national newspaper circulation, raising critical questions over the robustness of democratic discourse and the ability of alternative perspectives to break through mainstream channels.2. Globalisation of Media Ownership
Media ownership transcends national borders, with international giants such as Comcast (owner of Sky) and global streaming platforms like Netflix wielding enormous influence over British viewing habits and content production. The rise of global conglomerates accentuates concerns about dilution of local cultures and the risk of homogenised, lowest-common-denominator content dominating airwaves and algorithm-curated feeds.3. Technological Change and Ownership Patterns
The digital revolution has destabilised old certainties, allowing new actors—platforms like YouTube, TikTok, or independent podcast producers—to compete with legacy media. The low barriers to publication and monetisation have democratised certain aspects of ownership, yet tech companies (Google, Meta) now exert unprecedented control over both content distribution and advertising revenues.C. Sociological Perspectives on Ownership and Control
1. Marxist and Neo-Marxist Views
From a Marxist perspective, the concentration of media ownership in the hands of a wealthy elite ensures the media reinforces dominant class ideologies, perpetuating social inequalities by marginalising dissenting voices. The work of theorists such as Louis Althusser and Stuart Hall has been influential in UK media studies, highlighting the ideological function of media in producing consent for prevailing power structures.2. The Pluralist Critique
Pluralist theorists counter that audiences are not passive dupes; instead, they can critically evaluate competing viewpoints from a range of media sources. The UK’s robust tradition of print diversity—ranging from The Guardian to The Daily Mail—provides some support for pluralist arguments, although the true extent of diversity is undermined by ownership concentration.3. Postmodernist Views
As Jean Baudrillard and Zygmunt Bauman have argued in their postmodern analyses, traditional boundaries of ownership and control are being eroded in a fragmented, fluid media landscape. The proliferation of niche platforms and participatory media challenges the dominance of old media barons, enabling multiple, sometimes contradictory narratives to emerge.4. The Ideological Function of Media
Whichever model is emphasised, the overarching consensus is that media ownership does matter. Selection, framing, and representation of both news and entertainment are profoundly shaped by the interests, values, and worldviews of those in control, contributing to the reinforcement or contestation of prevailing ideologies.---
II. The Rise and Impact of New Media
A. Defining New Media and Components
‘New media’ refers to digital technologies such as social networking sites (Twitter, Instagram), interactive news outlets, apps, blogs, and on-demand streaming. Unlike ‘old’ media—heavily regulated, linear, and top-down—new media is decentralised, participatory, and constantly evolving. Rather than being mere consumers, individuals can become creators and distributors of content, as seen with UK-based YouTube stars or activist collectives using Twitter for grassroots campaigns.B. Transforming Production and Consumption
1. Shifting Roles of Producers
The rapid growth of citizen journalism illustrates the breakdown of old hierarchies. During the Grenfell Tower fire, local residents provided immediate, on-the-ground reporting through Facebook and Snapchat, often preceding mainstream news outlets. The capacity for ordinary people to challenge dominant narratives and contribute to the public agenda has thus been greatly enhanced.2. Audience Empowerment and Engagement
Audiences are no longer passive recipients but active participants who comment, share, remix, and co-create media. Fandoms, such as those around ‘Doctor Who’ or ‘Love Island’, exemplify how digital spaces can foster communities, circulating new forms of cultural identity and resistance.C. Sociological Analysis of New Media Effects
1. Neophiliac Optimism
Many celebrate new media’s potential to democratise information, amplify marginalised voices, and expand freedom of expression. The prominence of Black British campaigners on platforms like Twitter (e.g., #BlackLivesMatterUK) highlights new opportunities for civic engagement and cultural recognition.2. Cultural Pessimism
Others warn of widening digital divides—where class, age, and region determine access to technological benefits—and the spread of misinformation, as seen in the proliferation of ‘fake news’ around Brexit and COVID-19. Privacy concerns, surveillance, and the influence of algorithms on public discourse cast further shadows.3. Postmodern Fragmentation
Postmodernists note that new media blur the lines between reality and simulation; viral memes, deepfakes, and the blending of private and public lives online call into question the very boundaries of ‘truth’ in media representation.D. Issues of Access and Digital Inequality
Despite high levels of internet penetration, significant inequalities persist in the UK: rural regions, lower-income households, and older citizens are less likely to benefit from digital advances. This digital exclusion can fuel broader social inequalities, limiting participation in both democratic processes and educational opportunities.E. New Media and Democracy
Social media platforms have played a vital role in political mobilisation, from the Scottish Independence referendum to Extinction Rebellion protests. However, challenges abound, including echo chambers, targeted disinformation, and the manipulation of political opinions by opaque algorithms. The balance between freedom and harm online remains intensely debated.---
III. Mass Media, Globalisation, and Popular Culture
A. Media and Global Flows
Globalisation has turned the flow of media into a two-way street: British formats—such as ‘Strictly Come Dancing’—are exported worldwide, whilst British audiences are exposed to Korean dramas and Bollywood films. These cultural crosscurrents reshape both content and identity.B. Globalisation’s Impact on Structure and Content
Transnational corporations, notably Netflix and Disney, have eroded national borders in broadcasting, encouraging what sociologist John Tomlinson called “cultural hybridisation.” While some commentators decry cultural homogenisation—fearing an Americanised monoculture—others highlight how local producers reinterpret global trends (e.g. British grime music blending Caribbean and African influences).C. Popular Culture and the Media
Popular culture encompasses the everyday music, fashion, TV, and digital platforms that define the zeitgeist. The role of media in ritualising national moments—such as the Queen’s funeral or the annual Christmas broadcast—profoundly shapes social memory and collective identity, while also providing sites for contestation and subcultural creation.D. Theoretical Insights
Postmodern theorists see contemporary culture as a “pastiche”—a mosaic of styles, humour, irony, and simulacra, heightened by media’s centrality to everyday life. Meanwhile, the critique of cultural imperialism is ongoing, with British experiences complicated by both importing and exporting cultural forms. Audiences are not simply passive recipients; they resist, appropriate, and remake global content, as seen in the diversity of local podcasting or YouTube communities.E. Power and Cultural Influence
Control over media industries can translate directly into “soft power”—an ability to shape values and opinions beyond national borders. As policymakers worry about national sovereignty and the preservation of linguistic and cultural diversity, debates over content quotas in streaming or the future of public broadcasting acquire heightened significance.---
Conclusion
The ownership and control of mass media directly influence not only what is produced and who has a voice, but also the wider distribution of power in society. New media technologies have created both unprecedented opportunities for empowerment and risks of exclusion, surveillance, and distortion. Globalisation’s entanglement with the media has both broadened cultural horizons and challenged local distinctiveness. Critical engagement with mass media is therefore essential—whether through media literacy programmes in schools, robust policy interventions to foster diversity and inclusion, or ongoing academic inquiry. As the boundaries between producer and audience, local and global, real and virtual continue to blur, the imperative remains to question who benefits, who is excluded, and how we might reimagine the relationship between media, society, and self in a rapidly changing world.Example questions
The answers have been prepared by our teacher
What is mass media in modern Britain?
Mass media in modern Britain includes television, print, digital, and social media, shaping public opinion, culture, and political attitudes.
How does ownership affect mass media in modern Britain?
Ownership influences media content diversity and ideology, with concentrated ownership reducing plurality and potentially narrowing viewpoints.
What are examples of new media in modern Britain?
New media examples in modern Britain are digital platforms and social networking sites, which impact how audiences access and share information.
How has globalisation changed mass media in modern Britain?
Globalisation has enabled international companies and content to dominate British media, raising concerns about cultural identity and homogenisation.
What is the difference between private and public ownership in British mass media?
Private ownership prioritises profit and popular appeal, while public ownership like the BBC aims for impartiality and public service.
Rate:
Log in to rate the work.
Log in